Context: Surface replacement of the hip is aimed especially at active patients, and it seems to achieve optimal functional results in a short time if associated with a tailored rehabilitation protocol. Objective: To assess the functional outcome in a group of active patients after hip resurfacing. Design: Clinical measurement and controlled laboratory study in a case series. Setting: Gait-analysis laboratory. Participants: 8 patients and a control group of 10 subjects. Interventions: Patients treated with Birmingham hip-resurfacing system and a tailored rehabilitation protocol Main Outcome Measures: Clinical assessment (Harris Hip Score [HHS]) and instrumented gait analysis including muscular electromyographic assessment. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 9 mo follow-up after surgery. Results: HHS showed a significant increase from the baseline to 3- (P = .008) and 9-month (P = .014) follow-up; 5 patients returned to sport. Gait pattern in the presented case series of patients improved substantially 3 mo postoperatively, and minimal further changes were present 9 months postoperatively. Residual abnormalities of time–distance and hip-kinematics parameters were consistent with a slow gait. A complete restoration of the muscle-activation pattern during gait was achieved. Conclusion: Hip resurfacing associated with a rehabilitation protocol based on the characteristics of the implant provides excellent clinical and functional outcome, especially for very active patients.

Benedetti M.G., Berti L., Frizziero A., Ferrarese D., Giannini S. (2012). Functional recovery after hip resurfacing and rehabilitation. JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 211 (2), 167-174.

Functional recovery after hip resurfacing and rehabilitation.

BENEDETTI, MARIA GRAZIA;BERTI, LISA;GIANNINI, SANDRO
2012

Abstract

Context: Surface replacement of the hip is aimed especially at active patients, and it seems to achieve optimal functional results in a short time if associated with a tailored rehabilitation protocol. Objective: To assess the functional outcome in a group of active patients after hip resurfacing. Design: Clinical measurement and controlled laboratory study in a case series. Setting: Gait-analysis laboratory. Participants: 8 patients and a control group of 10 subjects. Interventions: Patients treated with Birmingham hip-resurfacing system and a tailored rehabilitation protocol Main Outcome Measures: Clinical assessment (Harris Hip Score [HHS]) and instrumented gait analysis including muscular electromyographic assessment. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 9 mo follow-up after surgery. Results: HHS showed a significant increase from the baseline to 3- (P = .008) and 9-month (P = .014) follow-up; 5 patients returned to sport. Gait pattern in the presented case series of patients improved substantially 3 mo postoperatively, and minimal further changes were present 9 months postoperatively. Residual abnormalities of time–distance and hip-kinematics parameters were consistent with a slow gait. A complete restoration of the muscle-activation pattern during gait was achieved. Conclusion: Hip resurfacing associated with a rehabilitation protocol based on the characteristics of the implant provides excellent clinical and functional outcome, especially for very active patients.
2012
Benedetti M.G., Berti L., Frizziero A., Ferrarese D., Giannini S. (2012). Functional recovery after hip resurfacing and rehabilitation. JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 211 (2), 167-174.
Benedetti M.G.; Berti L.; Frizziero A.; Ferrarese D.; Giannini S.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/121675
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact