The World Health Report 2000 proposed three fundamental goals for health systems encompassing population health, health care finance and health systems responsiveness. The goals incorporate both an efficiency and equity dimension. While inequalities in population health and health care finance have motivated two important strands of research, inequalities in responsiveness have received less attention in health economics. This paper examines inequality and polarisation in responsiveness, bridging this gap in the literature and contributing towards an integrated analysis of health systems performance. It uses data from the World Health Survey to measure and compare inequalities in responsiveness across 25 European countries. In order to respect the inherently ordinal nature of the responsiveness data, medianbased measures of inequality and polarisation are employed. The results suggest that, in the face of wide differences in the health systems analysed, there exists large variability in inequality in responsiveness across countries.

Inequality and Polarization in Health Systems Responsiveness: a Cross-Country Analysis / Jones A.M.; Rice N.; Robone S.; Rosa-Diaz P.. - In: JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0167-6296. - STAMPA. - 30(4):(2011), pp. 616-625. [10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.003]

Inequality and Polarization in Health Systems Responsiveness: a Cross-Country Analysis

ROBONE, SILVANA MARIA;
2011

Abstract

The World Health Report 2000 proposed three fundamental goals for health systems encompassing population health, health care finance and health systems responsiveness. The goals incorporate both an efficiency and equity dimension. While inequalities in population health and health care finance have motivated two important strands of research, inequalities in responsiveness have received less attention in health economics. This paper examines inequality and polarisation in responsiveness, bridging this gap in the literature and contributing towards an integrated analysis of health systems performance. It uses data from the World Health Survey to measure and compare inequalities in responsiveness across 25 European countries. In order to respect the inherently ordinal nature of the responsiveness data, medianbased measures of inequality and polarisation are employed. The results suggest that, in the face of wide differences in the health systems analysed, there exists large variability in inequality in responsiveness across countries.
2011
Inequality and Polarization in Health Systems Responsiveness: a Cross-Country Analysis / Jones A.M.; Rice N.; Robone S.; Rosa-Diaz P.. - In: JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0167-6296. - STAMPA. - 30(4):(2011), pp. 616-625. [10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.003]
Jones A.M.; Rice N.; Robone S.; Rosa-Diaz P.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/120721
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact