In order to define the seismic vulnerability of ancient brick masonries and to de-sign restoration and retrofitting interventions, the estimation of masonry mechani-cal properties (e.g. Young’s modulus, compressive strength, shear strength, etc.) is of primary importance. The use of actual masonry specimens (i.e. small portions of wall) to be tested either in situ or in laboratory can be performed only in few particular cases, hence many moderately destructive or non-destructive techniques have been proposed so far for indirect evaluation of masonry mechanical proper-ties, primarily compressive strength. In this study, the suitability of using 100 mm diameter cores for evaluating the compressive strength of brick masonries was in-vestigated. For a study case represented by a masonry arch-bridge, the compres-sive strength value resulting from testing cylindrical cores was compared to values obtained from testing bricks and mortars, separately, and from testing small masonry portions, used as reference. A FEM model of the cores was also devel-oped to evaluate the stress/strain regime inside the cores and analyze the influence of the possible presence of the vertical mortar joint in the centre of the core. The results obtained by testing cylindrical cores, bricks and mortars and small masonry portions exhibit very good agreement, which suggests that using small diameter cores could be a promising method, which has the advantage of using cores more easily available than large diameter (150 mm) cores.

E. Sassoni, C. Mazzotti (2013). THE USE OF SMALL DIAMETER CORES FOR ASSESSING THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CLAY BRICK MASONRIES. JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 14S, 95-101 [10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.027].

THE USE OF SMALL DIAMETER CORES FOR ASSESSING THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CLAY BRICK MASONRIES

SASSONI, ENRICO;MAZZOTTI, CLAUDIO
2013

Abstract

In order to define the seismic vulnerability of ancient brick masonries and to de-sign restoration and retrofitting interventions, the estimation of masonry mechani-cal properties (e.g. Young’s modulus, compressive strength, shear strength, etc.) is of primary importance. The use of actual masonry specimens (i.e. small portions of wall) to be tested either in situ or in laboratory can be performed only in few particular cases, hence many moderately destructive or non-destructive techniques have been proposed so far for indirect evaluation of masonry mechanical proper-ties, primarily compressive strength. In this study, the suitability of using 100 mm diameter cores for evaluating the compressive strength of brick masonries was in-vestigated. For a study case represented by a masonry arch-bridge, the compres-sive strength value resulting from testing cylindrical cores was compared to values obtained from testing bricks and mortars, separately, and from testing small masonry portions, used as reference. A FEM model of the cores was also devel-oped to evaluate the stress/strain regime inside the cores and analyze the influence of the possible presence of the vertical mortar joint in the centre of the core. The results obtained by testing cylindrical cores, bricks and mortars and small masonry portions exhibit very good agreement, which suggests that using small diameter cores could be a promising method, which has the advantage of using cores more easily available than large diameter (150 mm) cores.
2013
E. Sassoni, C. Mazzotti (2013). THE USE OF SMALL DIAMETER CORES FOR ASSESSING THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CLAY BRICK MASONRIES. JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 14S, 95-101 [10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.027].
E. Sassoni; C. Mazzotti
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/120557
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact