The effectiveness of the novel hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agent plerixafor was evaluated in nationwide compassionate use programs in 13 European countries. A total of 580 poor mobilizers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and multiple myeloma (MM) were enrolled. All patients received plerixafor plus granulocyte CSF with or without chemotherapy. Overall, the collection yield was significantly higher in MM patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.6%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 32.0%) than in NHL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 64.8%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 12.6%; P<0.0001) and also significantly higher in HL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.5%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 22.2%) than in NHL patients (P=0.013). In a subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in mobilization success comparing patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Our data emphasize the role of plerixafor in poor mobilizers, but further strategies to improve the apheresis yield especially in patients with NHL are required.

Hübel K, Fresen MM, Apperley JF, Basak GW, Douglas KW, Gabriel IH, et al. (2012). European Data on Stem Cell Mobilization with Plerixafor in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma Patients. A Subgroup Analysis of the European Consortium of Stem Cell Mobilization. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 47, 1046-1050 [10.1038/bmt.2011.216].

European Data on Stem Cell Mobilization with Plerixafor in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma Patients. A Subgroup Analysis of the European Consortium of Stem Cell Mobilization.

Lanza F;LEMOLI, ROBERTO MASSIMO;
2012

Abstract

The effectiveness of the novel hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agent plerixafor was evaluated in nationwide compassionate use programs in 13 European countries. A total of 580 poor mobilizers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and multiple myeloma (MM) were enrolled. All patients received plerixafor plus granulocyte CSF with or without chemotherapy. Overall, the collection yield was significantly higher in MM patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.6%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 32.0%) than in NHL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 64.8%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 12.6%; P<0.0001) and also significantly higher in HL patients (>2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 81.5%; >5.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg: 22.2%) than in NHL patients (P=0.013). In a subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in mobilization success comparing patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Our data emphasize the role of plerixafor in poor mobilizers, but further strategies to improve the apheresis yield especially in patients with NHL are required.
2012
Hübel K, Fresen MM, Apperley JF, Basak GW, Douglas KW, Gabriel IH, et al. (2012). European Data on Stem Cell Mobilization with Plerixafor in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma Patients. A Subgroup Analysis of the European Consortium of Stem Cell Mobilization. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 47, 1046-1050 [10.1038/bmt.2011.216].
Hübel K; Fresen MM; Apperley JF; Basak GW; Douglas KW; Gabriel IH; Geraldes C; Jaksic O; Koristek Z; Kröger N; Lanza F; Lemoli RM; Mikala G; Selleslag...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/119862
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 62
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 57
social impact