This retrospective study was carried out to assess the prognostic value of three classification systems used for staging cutaneous head and neck malig- nant melanoma (CHNME). Fifty-three patients with histologically proven CHNME were analyzed. Thirty patients were never treated before admis- sion, whereas 23 (43.4%) had a second radical re- section of the primary tumor location, 9 (17%) had neck nodes, none had distant metastasis, and all had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Results show that T-stage is the most important clinical prognostic parameter, whereas Clark’s and Breslow’s classifications have lower impact in defining prog- nosis. Sites of primary tumor determines different clinical outcomes, but this does not reach statistically significant values. A second surgery on the primary tumor location is possible and is effective toward survival. No statistical differences were noted be- tween the previously untreated and treated groups. Neck nodes have to be removed with neck dissection, and this regimen can improve the clinical outcome; however, only 40% of neck positive patients survive more than 5 years.

P. Morselli, L. Masciotra, V. Pinto, I. Zollino, G. Brunelli, F. Carinci (2007). Comparison Among Clark’s, Breslow’s, and TNM Classifications for Cutaneous Head and Neck Malignant Melanoma. THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 18(6), 1353-1358 [10.1097/scs.0b013e3180534453].

Comparison Among Clark’s, Breslow’s, and TNM Classifications for Cutaneous Head and Neck Malignant Melanoma

MORSELLI, PAOLO;PINTO, VALENTINA;
2007

Abstract

This retrospective study was carried out to assess the prognostic value of three classification systems used for staging cutaneous head and neck malig- nant melanoma (CHNME). Fifty-three patients with histologically proven CHNME were analyzed. Thirty patients were never treated before admis- sion, whereas 23 (43.4%) had a second radical re- section of the primary tumor location, 9 (17%) had neck nodes, none had distant metastasis, and all had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Results show that T-stage is the most important clinical prognostic parameter, whereas Clark’s and Breslow’s classifications have lower impact in defining prog- nosis. Sites of primary tumor determines different clinical outcomes, but this does not reach statistically significant values. A second surgery on the primary tumor location is possible and is effective toward survival. No statistical differences were noted be- tween the previously untreated and treated groups. Neck nodes have to be removed with neck dissection, and this regimen can improve the clinical outcome; however, only 40% of neck positive patients survive more than 5 years.
2007
P. Morselli, L. Masciotra, V. Pinto, I. Zollino, G. Brunelli, F. Carinci (2007). Comparison Among Clark’s, Breslow’s, and TNM Classifications for Cutaneous Head and Neck Malignant Melanoma. THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 18(6), 1353-1358 [10.1097/scs.0b013e3180534453].
P. Morselli; L. Masciotra; V. Pinto; I. Zollino; G. Brunelli; F. Carinci
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/119571
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact