This retrospective study was carried out to assess the prognostic value of three classification systems used for staging cutaneous head and neck malig- nant melanoma (CHNME). Fifty-three patients with histologically proven CHNME were analyzed. Thirty patients were never treated before admis- sion, whereas 23 (43.4%) had a second radical re- section of the primary tumor location, 9 (17%) had neck nodes, none had distant metastasis, and all had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Results show that T-stage is the most important clinical prognostic parameter, whereas Clark’s and Breslow’s classifications have lower impact in defining prog- nosis. Sites of primary tumor determines different clinical outcomes, but this does not reach statistically significant values. A second surgery on the primary tumor location is possible and is effective toward survival. No statistical differences were noted be- tween the previously untreated and treated groups. Neck nodes have to be removed with neck dissection, and this regimen can improve the clinical outcome; however, only 40% of neck positive patients survive more than 5 years.
P. Morselli, L. Masciotra, V. Pinto, I. Zollino, G. Brunelli, F. Carinci (2007). Comparison Among Clark’s, Breslow’s, and TNM Classifications for Cutaneous Head and Neck Malignant Melanoma. THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 18(6), 1353-1358 [10.1097/scs.0b013e3180534453].
Comparison Among Clark’s, Breslow’s, and TNM Classifications for Cutaneous Head and Neck Malignant Melanoma
MORSELLI, PAOLO;PINTO, VALENTINA;
2007
Abstract
This retrospective study was carried out to assess the prognostic value of three classification systems used for staging cutaneous head and neck malig- nant melanoma (CHNME). Fifty-three patients with histologically proven CHNME were analyzed. Thirty patients were never treated before admis- sion, whereas 23 (43.4%) had a second radical re- section of the primary tumor location, 9 (17%) had neck nodes, none had distant metastasis, and all had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Results show that T-stage is the most important clinical prognostic parameter, whereas Clark’s and Breslow’s classifications have lower impact in defining prog- nosis. Sites of primary tumor determines different clinical outcomes, but this does not reach statistically significant values. A second surgery on the primary tumor location is possible and is effective toward survival. No statistical differences were noted be- tween the previously untreated and treated groups. Neck nodes have to be removed with neck dissection, and this regimen can improve the clinical outcome; however, only 40% of neck positive patients survive more than 5 years.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


