BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of a multi-imaging PET with (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG in comparison with conventional imaging (CI) in recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). METHODS: 18 MTC patients who had thyroidectomy were included; they presented with elevated and rapidly increasing calcitonin levels during follow up. CI had revealed metastatic deposits in 9 patients. Patients were referred to us for a PET/CT with (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG. Histologic/cytologic confirmation of recurrent MTC was obtained in at least one PET-positive lesion in all patients. RESULTS: Foci of abnormal uptake were observed in 15 patients at (18)F-DOPA and in 11 at (18)F-FDG; 8 patients showed the same number of positive lesions with both tracers, 2 showed more lesions on (18)F-FDG, 1 was positive at (18)F-FDG alone and 5 at (18)F-DOPA alone. In 3 patients with a DOPA-positive loco-regional relapse a re-operation with curative intent was offered. SUV(max) values were higher for (18)F-FDG compared to (18)F-DOPA (mean 12.7+/-4.1 vs. 5.5+/-2.1, p<0.05). Calcitonin was higher in PET-positive patients compared to PET negative ones, while no significant differences were observed between (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: In MTC patients with rapidly increasing calcitonin levels during follow up, (18)F-DOPA has a good sensitivity and a complementary role with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic deposits. In our experience, the sensitivity of a multi-imaging (18)F-DOPA &(18)F-FDG PET/CT approach is greater than that obtained with CI. The higher SUV(max) values found with (18)F-FDG in some patients may reflect more aggressive tumors.

Marzola MC, Pelizzo MR, Ferdeghini M, Toniato A, Massaro A, Ambrosini V, et al. (2010). Dual PET/CT with (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma and rapidly increasing calcitonin levels: Comparison with conventional imaging. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 36, 414-421 [10.1016/j.ejso.2010.01.001].

Dual PET/CT with (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma and rapidly increasing calcitonin levels: Comparison with conventional imaging.

AMBROSINI, VALENTINA;FANTI, STEFANO;
2010

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of a multi-imaging PET with (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG in comparison with conventional imaging (CI) in recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). METHODS: 18 MTC patients who had thyroidectomy were included; they presented with elevated and rapidly increasing calcitonin levels during follow up. CI had revealed metastatic deposits in 9 patients. Patients were referred to us for a PET/CT with (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG. Histologic/cytologic confirmation of recurrent MTC was obtained in at least one PET-positive lesion in all patients. RESULTS: Foci of abnormal uptake were observed in 15 patients at (18)F-DOPA and in 11 at (18)F-FDG; 8 patients showed the same number of positive lesions with both tracers, 2 showed more lesions on (18)F-FDG, 1 was positive at (18)F-FDG alone and 5 at (18)F-DOPA alone. In 3 patients with a DOPA-positive loco-regional relapse a re-operation with curative intent was offered. SUV(max) values were higher for (18)F-FDG compared to (18)F-DOPA (mean 12.7+/-4.1 vs. 5.5+/-2.1, p<0.05). Calcitonin was higher in PET-positive patients compared to PET negative ones, while no significant differences were observed between (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: In MTC patients with rapidly increasing calcitonin levels during follow up, (18)F-DOPA has a good sensitivity and a complementary role with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic deposits. In our experience, the sensitivity of a multi-imaging (18)F-DOPA &(18)F-FDG PET/CT approach is greater than that obtained with CI. The higher SUV(max) values found with (18)F-FDG in some patients may reflect more aggressive tumors.
2010
Marzola MC, Pelizzo MR, Ferdeghini M, Toniato A, Massaro A, Ambrosini V, et al. (2010). Dual PET/CT with (18)F-DOPA and (18)F-FDG in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma and rapidly increasing calcitonin levels: Comparison with conventional imaging. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 36, 414-421 [10.1016/j.ejso.2010.01.001].
Marzola MC; Pelizzo MR; Ferdeghini M; Toniato A; Massaro A; Ambrosini V; Fanti S; Gross MD; Al-Nahhas A; Rubello D.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/118847
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 82
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 69
social impact