This paper deals with the issue if the Revenue Service (RS) should be allowed or even encouraged to negotiate settlement agreements with taxpayers subject to examination. We consider the case in which the RS enjoys discretion at the settlement stage, its stance being guided by enforcers's professional judgement. We show that discretionary settlements serve a desirable function, as they allow theRS to better exploit taxpayer-specific information and to take advantage of the bargaining power it can wield at the negotiation stage.
L. Franzoni (2004). Discretion in tax enforcement. ECONOMICA, 71, 369-389.
Discretion in tax enforcement
FRANZONI, LUIGI ALBERTO
2004
Abstract
This paper deals with the issue if the Revenue Service (RS) should be allowed or even encouraged to negotiate settlement agreements with taxpayers subject to examination. We consider the case in which the RS enjoys discretion at the settlement stage, its stance being guided by enforcers's professional judgement. We show that discretionary settlements serve a desirable function, as they allow theRS to better exploit taxpayer-specific information and to take advantage of the bargaining power it can wield at the negotiation stage.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.