This paper deals with the issue if the Revenue Service (RS) should be allowed or even encouraged to negotiate settlement agreements with taxpayers subject to examination. We consider the case in which the RS enjoys discretion at the settlement stage, its stance being guided by enforcers's professional judgement. We show that discretionary settlements serve a desirable function, as they allow theRS to better exploit taxpayer-specific information and to take advantage of the bargaining power it can wield at the negotiation stage.

L. Franzoni (2004). Discretion in tax enforcement. ECONOMICA, 71, 369-389.

Discretion in tax enforcement

FRANZONI, LUIGI ALBERTO
2004

Abstract

This paper deals with the issue if the Revenue Service (RS) should be allowed or even encouraged to negotiate settlement agreements with taxpayers subject to examination. We consider the case in which the RS enjoys discretion at the settlement stage, its stance being guided by enforcers's professional judgement. We show that discretionary settlements serve a desirable function, as they allow theRS to better exploit taxpayer-specific information and to take advantage of the bargaining power it can wield at the negotiation stage.
2004
L. Franzoni (2004). Discretion in tax enforcement. ECONOMICA, 71, 369-389.
L. Franzoni
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/11493
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact