Several solutions are currently being tested to improve the thermal efficiency of ground heat exchangers (GHEs) employed in geothermal closed loops. For shallow exchangers, the main effort is towards maximizing the surface available for heat exchange, while reducing the interference among exchangers; popular solutions towards this end are the slinky coil and the radiator shape. Recently, the flat panel has been proposed as a novel alternative to horizontal exchangers. In this study, the performance and thermal impact of the radiator and flat panel installations are compared by solving the transient flow and heat transport problem within the surrounding ground via a numerical model. Adopting the same computational conditions, the two installations yield different resulting domain thermal fields. The flat panel shows a higher capability to affect larger volumes of surrounding ground, so the soil temperatures reach values less extreme than in the radiator case. Since horizontal GHE temperatures remain 2–3° warmer in winter time, a higher coefficient of performance is expected for the flat panel.

M. Bottarelli, V. Di Federico (2012). Numerical comparison between two advanced HGHEs. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 7, 75-81 [10.1093/ijlct/ctr050].

Numerical comparison between two advanced HGHEs

DI FEDERICO, VITTORIO
2012

Abstract

Several solutions are currently being tested to improve the thermal efficiency of ground heat exchangers (GHEs) employed in geothermal closed loops. For shallow exchangers, the main effort is towards maximizing the surface available for heat exchange, while reducing the interference among exchangers; popular solutions towards this end are the slinky coil and the radiator shape. Recently, the flat panel has been proposed as a novel alternative to horizontal exchangers. In this study, the performance and thermal impact of the radiator and flat panel installations are compared by solving the transient flow and heat transport problem within the surrounding ground via a numerical model. Adopting the same computational conditions, the two installations yield different resulting domain thermal fields. The flat panel shows a higher capability to affect larger volumes of surrounding ground, so the soil temperatures reach values less extreme than in the radiator case. Since horizontal GHE temperatures remain 2–3° warmer in winter time, a higher coefficient of performance is expected for the flat panel.
2012
M. Bottarelli, V. Di Federico (2012). Numerical comparison between two advanced HGHEs. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 7, 75-81 [10.1093/ijlct/ctr050].
M. Bottarelli; V. Di Federico
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/112803
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact