The claims about (1) the lack of empirical support for a model of strong reciprocation and (2) the irrelevant empirical role of costly punishment to support cooperation in the field need qualifications. The interpretation of field evidence is not straightforward, and other-regarding preferences are also likely to play a role in the field.

M. Casari (2012). Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 35(1), 21-22 [10.1017/S0140525X11001191].

Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment

CASARI, MARCO
2012

Abstract

The claims about (1) the lack of empirical support for a model of strong reciprocation and (2) the irrelevant empirical role of costly punishment to support cooperation in the field need qualifications. The interpretation of field evidence is not straightforward, and other-regarding preferences are also likely to play a role in the field.
2012
M. Casari (2012). Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 35(1), 21-22 [10.1017/S0140525X11001191].
M. Casari
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/112520
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact