Following on from the success of the previous crystal structure prediction blind tests (CSP1999, CSP2001, CSP2004 and CSP2007), a fifth such collaborative project (CSP2010) was organized at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies was used by the participating groups in order to evaluate the ability of the current computational methods to predict the crystal structures of the six organic molecules chosen as targets for this blind test. The first four targets, two rigid molecules, one semi-flexible molecule and a 1:1 salt, matched the criteria for the targets from CSP2007, while the last two targets belonged to two new challenging categories - a larger, much more flexible molecule and a hydrate with more than one polymorph. Each group submitted three predictions for each target it attempted. There was at least one successful prediction for each target, and two groups were able to successfully predict the structure of the large flexible molecule as their first place submission. The results show that while not as many groups successfully predicted the structures of the three smallest molecules as in CSP2007, there is now evidence that methodologies such as dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) are able to reliably do so. The results also highlight the many challenges posed by more complex systems and show that there are still issues to be overcome.

D.A. Bardwell, C.S. Adjiman, Y.A. Arnautova, E. Bartashevich, S.X.M. Boerrigter, D.E. Braun, et al. (2011). Towards crystal structure prediction of complex organic compounds - a report on the fifth blind test. ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA. SECTION B, STRUCTURAL SCIENCE, 67, 535-551 [10.1107/S0108768111042868].

Towards crystal structure prediction of complex organic compounds - a report on the fifth blind test.

DELLA VALLE, RAFFAELE GUIDO;VENUTI, ELISABETTA;
2011

Abstract

Following on from the success of the previous crystal structure prediction blind tests (CSP1999, CSP2001, CSP2004 and CSP2007), a fifth such collaborative project (CSP2010) was organized at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies was used by the participating groups in order to evaluate the ability of the current computational methods to predict the crystal structures of the six organic molecules chosen as targets for this blind test. The first four targets, two rigid molecules, one semi-flexible molecule and a 1:1 salt, matched the criteria for the targets from CSP2007, while the last two targets belonged to two new challenging categories - a larger, much more flexible molecule and a hydrate with more than one polymorph. Each group submitted three predictions for each target it attempted. There was at least one successful prediction for each target, and two groups were able to successfully predict the structure of the large flexible molecule as their first place submission. The results show that while not as many groups successfully predicted the structures of the three smallest molecules as in CSP2007, there is now evidence that methodologies such as dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) are able to reliably do so. The results also highlight the many challenges posed by more complex systems and show that there are still issues to be overcome.
2011
D.A. Bardwell, C.S. Adjiman, Y.A. Arnautova, E. Bartashevich, S.X.M. Boerrigter, D.E. Braun, et al. (2011). Towards crystal structure prediction of complex organic compounds - a report on the fifth blind test. ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA. SECTION B, STRUCTURAL SCIENCE, 67, 535-551 [10.1107/S0108768111042868].
D.A. Bardwell; C.S. Adjiman; Y.A. Arnautova; E. Bartashevich; S.X.M. Boerrigter; D.E. Braun; A.J. Cruz-Cabeza; G.M. Day; R.G. Della Valle; G.R. Desira...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/112444
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 355
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 359
social impact