has been progressively used to stage and diagnose pancreaticobiliary and GI benign and malignant disorders. Comparison studies have shown that EUS is more accurate than transabdominal US, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and staging of GI and extraluminal lesions.1-3 In addition, EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) is a well-established technique allowing for tissue sampling whenever indicated.4 However, EUS presents a few limitations. First, it is very operator dependent. Second, it requires high levels of training and a high yearly volume of examinations to maintain adequate diagnostic skills.5 Third, biliary stents and chronic pancreatitis act as confounding factors limiting EUS accuracy in pancreaticobiliary exploration.6,7 The same limitations may hamper EUS-FNA accuracy, too.8-11 To limit EUS shortcomings, researchers have used several techniques of image enhancement. These imaging techniques will hopefully make EUS less operator dependent, predict the histologic nature of the lesions before EUS-FNA, and allow more reliable assessment of malignant infiltration. The purpose of this review is to describe the methodology of the available techniques and to put them in the appropriate clinical context.

Techniques of image enhancement in EUS (with videos).

FUSAROLI, PIETRO;CALETTI, GIANCARLO;
2011

Abstract

has been progressively used to stage and diagnose pancreaticobiliary and GI benign and malignant disorders. Comparison studies have shown that EUS is more accurate than transabdominal US, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and staging of GI and extraluminal lesions.1-3 In addition, EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) is a well-established technique allowing for tissue sampling whenever indicated.4 However, EUS presents a few limitations. First, it is very operator dependent. Second, it requires high levels of training and a high yearly volume of examinations to maintain adequate diagnostic skills.5 Third, biliary stents and chronic pancreatitis act as confounding factors limiting EUS accuracy in pancreaticobiliary exploration.6,7 The same limitations may hamper EUS-FNA accuracy, too.8-11 To limit EUS shortcomings, researchers have used several techniques of image enhancement. These imaging techniques will hopefully make EUS less operator dependent, predict the histologic nature of the lesions before EUS-FNA, and allow more reliable assessment of malignant infiltration. The purpose of this review is to describe the methodology of the available techniques and to put them in the appropriate clinical context.
2011
Fusaroli P; Saftoiu A; Mancino MG; Caletti G; Eloubeidi MA.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/108619
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact