This essay contributes to cultural studies by proposing a framework that navigates interdisciplinary complexity through the lens of the study of material culture and embodied consumer practices. Starting from the idea that interdisciplinarity cannot be reduced to a simple summatory of disciplines but instead requires a radical integration of languages, concepts, and methods, the essay explores how interdisciplinarity emerges from the transformative encounter between different provinces of knowledge, historically consolidated as disciplines. Still, recomposing these diverse perspectives entails a continuous movement between disciplinary maps and the terrains of lived experience. When the epistemological momentum of interdisciplinarity gives way to disciplinary or interdisciplinary instrumental function embedded in networks of power, very mundane difficulties arise in producing genuine integration. This reveals the paradoxical nature of interdisciplinarity. As such, it can be traced to four fundamental paradoxes: political-institutional, epistemological, theoretical-methodological, and practical. Reflecting on my situated research experience and trajectory – on «consumer bodies» as crossroads between material culture studies, embodiment and the interdisciplinary study of consumption – this essay highlights the need for forms of thought and practice capable of harmonizing without homogenizing and connecting without abstracting. From this perspective, rather than levelling differences we should work towards meshwork configurations which allow for the construction of liminal, transitional spaces that represent the most suitable models for addressing the in-becoming nature of interdisciplinary work.

Sassatelli, R. (2026). Interdisciplinarità e cultura materiale. Attraverso la capacità di aspirare e oltre. STUDI CULTURALI, 23(1), 45-68.

Interdisciplinarità e cultura materiale. Attraverso la capacità di aspirare e oltre.

Roberta Sassatelli
2026

Abstract

This essay contributes to cultural studies by proposing a framework that navigates interdisciplinary complexity through the lens of the study of material culture and embodied consumer practices. Starting from the idea that interdisciplinarity cannot be reduced to a simple summatory of disciplines but instead requires a radical integration of languages, concepts, and methods, the essay explores how interdisciplinarity emerges from the transformative encounter between different provinces of knowledge, historically consolidated as disciplines. Still, recomposing these diverse perspectives entails a continuous movement between disciplinary maps and the terrains of lived experience. When the epistemological momentum of interdisciplinarity gives way to disciplinary or interdisciplinary instrumental function embedded in networks of power, very mundane difficulties arise in producing genuine integration. This reveals the paradoxical nature of interdisciplinarity. As such, it can be traced to four fundamental paradoxes: political-institutional, epistemological, theoretical-methodological, and practical. Reflecting on my situated research experience and trajectory – on «consumer bodies» as crossroads between material culture studies, embodiment and the interdisciplinary study of consumption – this essay highlights the need for forms of thought and practice capable of harmonizing without homogenizing and connecting without abstracting. From this perspective, rather than levelling differences we should work towards meshwork configurations which allow for the construction of liminal, transitional spaces that represent the most suitable models for addressing the in-becoming nature of interdisciplinary work.
2026
Sassatelli, R. (2026). Interdisciplinarità e cultura materiale. Attraverso la capacità di aspirare e oltre. STUDI CULTURALI, 23(1), 45-68.
Sassatelli, Roberta
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1079590
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact