Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
We present an end-to-end, iterative pipeline for efficient identification of strong galaxy-galaxy lensing systems, applied to theEuclidQ1 imaging data. Starting from the VIS catalogues, we rejected point sources, applied a magnitude cut (I-E <= 24) on the deflectors, and ran a pixel-level artefact-and-noise filter to build 96 & times; 96 pixel cutouts. The VIS+NISP colour composites were constructed with a VIS-anchored luminance scheme that preserves VIS morphology and NISP colour contrast. A VIS-only seed classifier supplies clear positives and typical impostors, which we used to curate a morphology-balanced negative set and augment scarce positives. Among the six compact convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that had been studied initially, the modified VGG16 (GlobalAveragePooling + 256/128 dense layers with the last nine layers trainable) exhibited the best performance. In our run, the training set grew from 27 seed lenses (augmented 67 & times; to 1809) plus 2000 negatives to a colour dataset of 30 686 images. After three rounds of iterative fine-tuning, a human grading of the top 4000 candidates ranked by the final model yielded 441 Grade A/B candidate lensing systems, including 311 overlapping with the existing Q1 strong-lens catalogue, and 130 additional A/B candidates (9 As and 121 Bs) not previously reported. Independently, the model recovered 740 out of 905 (81.8%) candidate Q1 lenses within its top 20 000 predictions, considering off-centred samples. Candidates spanI(E) similar or equal to 17-24 AB mag (median 21.3 AB mag) and are redder inY(E) - H(E)than the parent population, consistent with massive early-type deflectors. Each training iteration required about a week for a small team and the approach can easily be scaled to future wide-areaEuclidreleases. Subsequent works will focus on calibrating the selection function via lens injection, extending recall through uncertainty-aware active learning, and exploring multi-scale or attention-based neural networks with fast post hoc vetters that incorporate lens models into the classification.
Xu, X., Chen, R., Li, T., Cooray, A.r., Schuldt, S., Barroso, J., et al. (2026). Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1) XLI. AgileLens: A scalable CNN-based pipeline for strong gravitational lens identification. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 712, 1-30 [10.1051/0004-6361/202660307].
Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1) XLI. AgileLens: A scalable CNN-based pipeline for strong gravitational lens identification
We present an end-to-end, iterative pipeline for efficient identification of strong galaxy-galaxy lensing systems, applied to theEuclidQ1 imaging data. Starting from the VIS catalogues, we rejected point sources, applied a magnitude cut (I-E <= 24) on the deflectors, and ran a pixel-level artefact-and-noise filter to build 96 & times; 96 pixel cutouts. The VIS+NISP colour composites were constructed with a VIS-anchored luminance scheme that preserves VIS morphology and NISP colour contrast. A VIS-only seed classifier supplies clear positives and typical impostors, which we used to curate a morphology-balanced negative set and augment scarce positives. Among the six compact convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that had been studied initially, the modified VGG16 (GlobalAveragePooling + 256/128 dense layers with the last nine layers trainable) exhibited the best performance. In our run, the training set grew from 27 seed lenses (augmented 67 & times; to 1809) plus 2000 negatives to a colour dataset of 30 686 images. After three rounds of iterative fine-tuning, a human grading of the top 4000 candidates ranked by the final model yielded 441 Grade A/B candidate lensing systems, including 311 overlapping with the existing Q1 strong-lens catalogue, and 130 additional A/B candidates (9 As and 121 Bs) not previously reported. Independently, the model recovered 740 out of 905 (81.8%) candidate Q1 lenses within its top 20 000 predictions, considering off-centred samples. Candidates spanI(E) similar or equal to 17-24 AB mag (median 21.3 AB mag) and are redder inY(E) - H(E)than the parent population, consistent with massive early-type deflectors. Each training iteration required about a week for a small team and the approach can easily be scaled to future wide-areaEuclidreleases. Subsequent works will focus on calibrating the selection function via lens injection, extending recall through uncertainty-aware active learning, and exploring multi-scale or attention-based neural networks with fast post hoc vetters that incorporate lens models into the classification.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1079411
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
0
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.