Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
Recent observations with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have revealed an interesting population of sources with a compact morphology and a characteristic v-shaped continuum, namely blue at a rest frame λ < 4000 Å and red at longer wavelengths. The nature of these sources, which are called little red dots (LRDs), is still highly debated because it is unclear whether they host active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and their number seems to drop drastically at z < 4. We took advantage of the 63 deg2 covered by the Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1) to extend the search for LRDs to brighter magnitudes and lower redshifts than what was possible with JWST. This is fundamental for a broader view of the evolution of this peculiar galaxy population. The selection was performed by fitting the available photometric data (Euclid, the Spitzer Infrared Array Camera (IRAC), and ground-based griz data) with two power laws to retrieve the rest-frame optical and UV slopes consistently over a wide redshift range (i.e. z < 7.6). We then excluded extended objects and possible line emitters and inspected the data visually to remove any imaging artefacts. The final selection included 3341 LRD candidates from z = 0.33 to z = 3.6, 29 of which were also detected in IRAC. The resulting rest-frame UV luminosity function, in contrast with previous JWST studies, shows that the number density of LRD candidates increases from high redshift to z = 1.5–2.5 and decreases at even lower redshifts. The subsample of more robust LRD candidates that are also detected with IRAC show a weaker evolution, however, which is affected by low statistics and limited by the IRAC resolution. The comparison with previous quasar UV luminosity functions shows that LRDs are not the dominant AGN population at z < 4 and MUV < −21. Follow-up studies of these LRD candidates are pivotal to confirm their nature, probe their physical properties, and determine whether they are compatible with JWST sources because the different spatial resolution and wavelength coverage of Euclid and JWST might select different samples of compact sources.
Bisigello, L., Rodighiero, G., Fotopoulou, S., Ricci, F., Jahnke, K., Feltre, A., et al. (2026). Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1): XXIV. Extending the quest for little red dots to z < 4. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 711, 1-21 [10.1051/0004-6361/202554537].
Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1): XXIV. Extending the quest for little red dots to z < 4
L. Bisigello;G. Rodighiero;S. Fotopoulou;F. Ricci;K. Jahnke;A. Feltre;V. Allevato;F. Shankar;P. Cassata;E. Dalla Bontà;G. Gandolfi;G. Girardi;M. Giulietti;A. Grazian;C. C. Lovell;R. Maiolino;T. Matamoro Zatarain;M. Mezcua;I. Prandoni;D. Roberts;W. Roster;M. Salvato;M. Siudek;F. Tarsitano;Y. Toba;A. Vietri;L. Wang;G. Zamorani;M. Baes;S. Belladitta;A. Nersesian;L. Spinoglio;X. Lopez Lopez;N. Aghanim;B. Altieri;A. Amara;S. Andreon;N. Auricchio;H. Aussel;C. Baccigalupi;M. Baldi;A. Balestra;S. Bardelli;A. Basset;P. Battaglia;R. Bender;A. Biviano;A. Bonchi;E. Branchini;M. Brescia;J. Brinchmann;S. Camera;G. Cañas-Herrera;V. Capobianco;C. Carbone;J. Carretero;S. Casas;M. Castellano;G. Castignani;S. Cavuoti;K. C. Chambers;A. Cimatti;C. Colodro-Conde;G. Congedo;C. J. Conselice;L. Conversi;Y. Copin;F. Courbin;H. M. Courtois;M. Cropper;A. Da Silva;H. Degaudenzi;G. De Lucia;A. M. Di Giorgio;C. Dolding;H. Dole;F. Dubath;C. A. J. Duncan;X. Dupac;S. Dusini;A. Ealet;S. Escoffier;M. Farina;R. Farinelli;F. Faustini;S. Ferriol;F. Finelli;M. Frailis;E. Franceschi;S. Galeotta;K. George;W. Gillard;B. Gillis;C. Giocoli;P. Gómez-Alvarez;J. Gracia-Carpio;B. R. Granett;F. Grupp;S. Gwyn;S. V. H. Haugan;H. Hoekstra;W. Holmes;I. M. Hook;F. Hormuth;A. Hornstrup;P. Hudelot;M. Jhabvala;E. Keihänen;S. Kermiche;A. Kiessling;B. Kubik;M. Kümmel;M. Kunz;H. Kurki-Suonio;Q. Le Boulc'h;A. M. C. Le Brun;D. Le Mignant;P. Liebing;S. Ligori;P. B. Lilje;V. Lindholm;I. Lloro;G. Mainetti;D. Maino;E. Maiorano;O. Mansutti;S. Marcin;O. Marggraf;M. Martinelli;N. Martinet;F. Marulli;R. Massey;S. Maurogordato;E. Medinaceli;S. Mei;M. Melchior;Y. Mellier;M. Meneghetti;E. Merlin;G. Meylan;A. Mora;M. Moresco;L. Moscardini;R. Nakajima;C. Neissner;S. -M. Niemi;J. W. Nightingale;C. Padilla;S. Paltani;F. Pasian;K. Pedersen;W. J. Percival;V. Pettorino;S. Pires;G. Polenta;M. Poncet;L. A. Popa;L. Pozzetti;F. Raison;R. Rebolo;A. Renzi;J. Rhodes;G. Riccio;E. Romelli;M. Roncarelli;E. Rossetti;H. J. A. Rottgering;B. Rusholme;R. Saglia;Z. Sakr;D. Sapone;B. Sartoris;J. A. Schewtschenko;M. Schirmer;P. Schneider;T. Schrabback;M. Scodeggio;A. Secroun;G. Seidel;S. Serrano;P. Simon;C. Sirignano;G. Sirri;L. Stanco;J. Steinwagner;P. Tallada-Crespí;A. N. Taylor;H. I. Teplitz;I. Tereno;S. Toft;R. Toledo-Moreo;F. Torradeflot;I. Tutusaus;L. Valenziano;J. Valiviita;T. Vassallo;G. Verdoes Kleijn;A. Veropalumbo;Y. Wang;J. Weller;A. Zacchei;F. M. Zerbi;I. A. Zinchenko;E. Zucca;M. Ballardini;M. Bolzonella;E. Bozzo;C. Burigana;R. Cabanac;A. Cappi;D. Di Ferdinando;J. A. Escartin Vigo;L. Gabarra;J. Martín-Fleitas;S. Matthew;M. Maturi;N. Mauri;A. Pezzotta;M. Pöntinen;C. Porciani;I. Risso;V. Scottez;M. Sereno;M. Tenti;M. Viel;M. Wiesmann;Y. Akrami;I. T. Andika;S. Anselmi;M. Archidiacono;F. Atrio-Barandela;C. Benoist;K. Benson;D. Bertacca;M. Bethermin;A. Blanchard;L. Blot;M. L. Brown;S. Bruton;A. Calabro;F. Caro;C. S. Carvalho;T. Castro;Y. Charles;F. Cogato;T. Contini;A. R. Cooray;O. Cucciati;S. Davini;F. De Paolis;G. Desprez;A. Díaz-Sánchez;J. J. Diaz;S. Di Domizio;J. M. Diego;A. Enia;Y. Fang;A. G. Ferrari;P. G. Ferreira;A. Finoguenov;A. Fontana;F. Fontanot;A. Franco;K. Ganga;J. García-Bellido;T. Gasparetto;V. Gautard;E. Gaztanaga;F. Giacomini;F. Gianotti;G. Gozaliasl;M. Guidi;C. M. Gutierrez;A. Hall;W. G. Hartley;S. Hemmati;C. Hernández-Monteagudo;H. Hildebrandt;J. Hjorth;J. J. E. Kajava;Y. Kang;V. Kansal;D. Karagiannis;K. Kiiveri;C. C. Kirkpatrick;S. Kruk;J. Le Graet;L. Legrand;M. Lembo;F. Lepori;G. Leroy;G. F. Lesci;J. Lesgourgues;L. Leuzzi;T. I. Liaudat;A. Loureiro;J. Macias-Perez;G. Maggio;M. Magliocchetti;E. A. Magnier;C. Mancini;F. Mannucci;R. Maoli;C. J. A. P. Martins;L. Maurin;M. Miluzio;P. Monaco;C. Moretti;G. Morgante;S. Nadathur;K. Naidoo;A. Navarro-Alsina;S. Nesseris;F. Passalacqua;K. Paterson;L. Patrizii;A. Pisani;D. Potter;S. Quai;M. Radovich;P. -F. Rocci;S. Sacquegna;M. Sahlén;D. B. Sanders;E. Sarpa;C. Scarlata;J. Schaye;A. Schneider;D. Sciotti;E. Sellentin;A. Shulevski;L. C. Smith;K. Tanidis;C. Tao;G. Testera;R. Teyssier;S. Tosi;A. Troja;M. Tucci;C. Valieri;A. Venhola;D. Vergani;G. Verza;P. Vielzeuf;A. Viitanen;N. A. Walton;J. R. Weaver;E. Soubrie;D. Scott
2026
Abstract
Recent observations with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have revealed an interesting population of sources with a compact morphology and a characteristic v-shaped continuum, namely blue at a rest frame λ < 4000 Å and red at longer wavelengths. The nature of these sources, which are called little red dots (LRDs), is still highly debated because it is unclear whether they host active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and their number seems to drop drastically at z < 4. We took advantage of the 63 deg2 covered by the Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1) to extend the search for LRDs to brighter magnitudes and lower redshifts than what was possible with JWST. This is fundamental for a broader view of the evolution of this peculiar galaxy population. The selection was performed by fitting the available photometric data (Euclid, the Spitzer Infrared Array Camera (IRAC), and ground-based griz data) with two power laws to retrieve the rest-frame optical and UV slopes consistently over a wide redshift range (i.e. z < 7.6). We then excluded extended objects and possible line emitters and inspected the data visually to remove any imaging artefacts. The final selection included 3341 LRD candidates from z = 0.33 to z = 3.6, 29 of which were also detected in IRAC. The resulting rest-frame UV luminosity function, in contrast with previous JWST studies, shows that the number density of LRD candidates increases from high redshift to z = 1.5–2.5 and decreases at even lower redshifts. The subsample of more robust LRD candidates that are also detected with IRAC show a weaker evolution, however, which is affected by low statistics and limited by the IRAC resolution. The comparison with previous quasar UV luminosity functions shows that LRDs are not the dominant AGN population at z < 4 and MUV < −21. Follow-up studies of these LRD candidates are pivotal to confirm their nature, probe their physical properties, and determine whether they are compatible with JWST sources because the different spatial resolution and wavelength coverage of Euclid and JWST might select different samples of compact sources.
Bisigello, L., Rodighiero, G., Fotopoulou, S., Ricci, F., Jahnke, K., Feltre, A., et al. (2026). Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1): XXIV. Extending the quest for little red dots to z < 4. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 711, 1-21 [10.1051/0004-6361/202554537].
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1078712
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.