Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
To better understand the role of active galactic nuclei (AGN) in galaxy evolution, it is crucial to work with a complete and pure AGN sample. X-ray surveys are key to doing so, but their larger positional uncertainties complicate counterpart (CTP) association, further compounded by the limited availability of deep, uniform multi-wavelength ancillary data. Euclid is revolutionising this identification effort, offering extensive coverage of nearly the entire extragalactic sky, particularly in the near-infrared bands, where AGN are more easily detected. Using the first Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1), we validated the methods for identifying and classifying Euclid CTPs of known point-like sources from major X-ray surveys, including XMM-Newton, Chandra, and eROSITA. Using Bayesian statistics, combined with machine learning (ML), as incorporated in the algorithm NWAY, we identified the CTPs of 11 286 X-ray sources from the three X-ray telescopes. For the large majority of 10 194 sources, the association is unique, with the remaining ∼10% of multi-CTP cases equally split between XMM-Newton and eROSITA. Six percent of the Euclid CTPs are detected in more than one X-ray survey. We then used ML to distinguish between Galactic (8%) and extragalactic (92%) sources. We computed photo-zs using deep learning for the 9259 sources detected in the tenth data release of the DESI Legacy Survey, reaching an accuracy and a fraction of outliers of roughly 5%. Based on their X-ray luminosities, all CTPs identified as extragalactic are classified as AGN, most of which appear as type I AGN according to their hardness ratios. With this paper, we release our catalogue, which includes identifiers, basic X-ray properties, the reliability of the associations, and additional property extensions, such as Galactic- or extragalactic classifications and photometric/spectroscopic redshifts. We also provide probabilities for sub-selecting the sample based on purity and completeness, in order to allow users to tailor the sample according to their specific needs.
Roster, W., Salvato, M., Buchner, J., Shirley, R., Lusso, E., Landt, H., et al. (2026). Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1): XVI. Optical and near-infrared identification and classification of point-like X-ray selected sources. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 711, 1-25 [10.1051/0004-6361/202554616].
Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1): XVI. Optical and near-infrared identification and classification of point-like X-ray selected sources
W. Roster;M. Salvato;J. Buchner;R. Shirley;E. Lusso;H. Landt;G. Zamorani;M. Siudek;B. Laloux;T. Matamoro Zatarain;F. Ricci;S. Fotopoulou;A. Ferré-Mateu;X. Lopez Lopez;N. Aghanim;B. Altieri;A. Amara;S. Andreon;N. Auricchio;H. Aussel;C. Baccigalupi;M. Baldi;A. Balestra;S. Bardelli;P. Battaglia;A. Biviano;A. Bonchi;E. Branchini;M. Brescia;J. Brinchmann;S. Camera;G. Cañas-Herrera;V. Capobianco;C. Carbone;J. Carretero;S. Casas;M. Castellano;G. Castignani;S. Cavuoti;K. C. Chambers;A. Cimatti;C. Colodro-Conde;G. Congedo;C. J. Conselice;L. Conversi;Y. Copin;F. Courbin;H. M. Courtois;M. Cropper;A. Da Silva;H. Degaudenzi;G. De Lucia;A. M. Di Giorgio;C. Dolding;H. Dole;F. Dubath;C. A. J. Duncan;X. Dupac;S. Dusini;S. Escoffier;M. Fabricius;M. Farina;R. Farinelli;F. Faustini;S. Ferriol;F. Finelli;P. Fosalba;N. Fourmanoit;M. Frailis;E. Franceschi;S. Galeotta;K. George;B. Gillis;C. Giocoli;J. Gracia-Carpio;B. R. Granett;A. Grazian;F. Grupp;S. Gwyn;S. V. H. Haugan;W. Holmes;I. M. Hook;F. Hormuth;A. Hornstrup;P. Hudelot;K. Jahnke;M. Jhabvala;E. Keihänen;S. Kermiche;A. Kiessling;B. Kubik;M. Kümmel;M. Kunz;H. Kurki-Suonio;Q. Le Boulc'h;A. M. C. Le Brun;D. Le Mignant;S. Ligori;P. B. Lilje;V. Lindholm;I. Lloro;G. Mainetti;D. Maino;E. Maiorano;O. Mansutti;S. Marcin;O. Marggraf;M. Martinelli;N. Martinet;F. Marulli;R. Massey;D. C. Masters;E. Medinaceli;S. Mei;M. Melchior;Y. Mellier;M. Meneghetti;E. Merlin;G. Meylan;A. Mora;M. Moresco;L. Moscardini;R. Nakajima;C. Neissner;S. -M. Niemi;J. W. Nightingale;C. Padilla;S. Paltani;F. Pasian;K. Pedersen;W. J. Percival;V. Pettorino;S. Pires;G. Polenta;M. Poncet;L. A. Popa;L. Pozzetti;F. Raison;R. Rebolo;A. Renzi;J. Rhodes;G. Riccio;E. Romelli;M. Roncarelli;R. Saglia;Z. Sakr;A. G. Sánchez;D. Sapone;B. Sartoris;J. A. Schewtschenko;M. Schirmer;P. Schneider;T. Schrabback;A. Secroun;G. Seidel;M. Seiffert;S. Serrano;P. Simon;C. Sirignano;G. Sirri;L. Stanco;J. Steinwagner;P. Tallada-Crespí;D. Tavagnacco;A. N. Taylor;I. Tereno;S. Toft;R. Toledo-Moreo;F. Torradeflot;I. Tutusaus;L. Valenziano;J. Valiviita;T. Vassallo;G. Verdoes Kleijn;A. Veropalumbo;Y. Wang;J. Weller;A. Zacchei;F. M. Zerbi;I. A. Zinchenko;E. Zucca;V. Allevato;M. Ballardini;M. Bolzonella;E. Bozzo;C. Burigana;R. Cabanac;A. Cappi;D. Di Ferdinando;J. A. Escartin Vigo;L. Gabarra;J. Martín-Fleitas;S. Matthew;N. Mauri;R. B. Metcalf;A. Pezzotta;M. Pöntinen;C. Porciani;I. Risso;V. Scottez;M. Sereno;M. Tenti;M. Viel;M. Wiesmann;Y. Akrami;I. T. Andika;S. Anselmi;M. Archidiacono;F. Atrio-Barandela;C. Benoist;K. Benson;D. Bertacca;M. Bethermin;L. Bisigello;A. Blanchard;L. Blot;H. Böhringer;M. L. Brown;S. Bruton;A. Calabro;F. Caro;C. S. Carvalho;T. Castro;F. Cogato;A. R. Cooray;O. Cucciati;S. Davini;F. De Paolis;G. Desprez;A. Díaz-Sánchez;J. J. Diaz;S. Di Domizio;J. M. Diego;A. Enia;Y. Fang;A. G. Ferrari;A. Finoguenov;A. Fontana;A. Franco;K. Ganga;J. García-Bellido;T. Gasparetto;V. Gautard;E. Gaztanaga;F. Giacomini;F. Gianotti;G. Gozaliasl;M. Guidi;C. M. Gutierrez;A. Hall;W. G. Hartley;S. Hemmati;C. Hernández-Monteagudo;H. Hildebrandt;J. Hjorth;J. J. E. Kajava;Y. Kang;V. Kansal;D. Karagiannis;K. Kiiveri;C. C. Kirkpatrick;S. Kruk;J. Le Graet;L. Legrand;M. Lembo;F. Lepori;G. Leroy;G. F. Lesci;J. Lesgourgues;L. Leuzzi;T. I. Liaudat;A. Loureiro;J. Macias-Perez;G. Maggio;M. Magliocchetti;F. Mannucci;R. Maoli;C. J. A. P. Martins;L. Maurin;M. Miluzio;P. Monaco;C. Moretti;G. Morgante;K. Naidoo;A. Navarro-Alsina;S. Nesseris;F. Passalacqua;K. Paterson;L. Patrizii;A. Pisani;D. Potter;S. Quai;M. Radovich;S. Sacquegna;M. Sahlén;D. B. Sanders;E. Sarpa;A. Schneider;D. Sciotti;E. Sellentin;F. Shankar;L. C. Smith;K. Tanidis;G. Testera;R. Teyssier;S. Tosi;A. Troja;M. Tucci;C. Valieri;A. Venhola;D. Vergani;G. Verza;P. Vielzeuf;A. Viitanen;N. A. Walton;E. Soubrie;D. Scott
2026
Abstract
To better understand the role of active galactic nuclei (AGN) in galaxy evolution, it is crucial to work with a complete and pure AGN sample. X-ray surveys are key to doing so, but their larger positional uncertainties complicate counterpart (CTP) association, further compounded by the limited availability of deep, uniform multi-wavelength ancillary data. Euclid is revolutionising this identification effort, offering extensive coverage of nearly the entire extragalactic sky, particularly in the near-infrared bands, where AGN are more easily detected. Using the first Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1), we validated the methods for identifying and classifying Euclid CTPs of known point-like sources from major X-ray surveys, including XMM-Newton, Chandra, and eROSITA. Using Bayesian statistics, combined with machine learning (ML), as incorporated in the algorithm NWAY, we identified the CTPs of 11 286 X-ray sources from the three X-ray telescopes. For the large majority of 10 194 sources, the association is unique, with the remaining ∼10% of multi-CTP cases equally split between XMM-Newton and eROSITA. Six percent of the Euclid CTPs are detected in more than one X-ray survey. We then used ML to distinguish between Galactic (8%) and extragalactic (92%) sources. We computed photo-zs using deep learning for the 9259 sources detected in the tenth data release of the DESI Legacy Survey, reaching an accuracy and a fraction of outliers of roughly 5%. Based on their X-ray luminosities, all CTPs identified as extragalactic are classified as AGN, most of which appear as type I AGN according to their hardness ratios. With this paper, we release our catalogue, which includes identifiers, basic X-ray properties, the reliability of the associations, and additional property extensions, such as Galactic- or extragalactic classifications and photometric/spectroscopic redshifts. We also provide probabilities for sub-selecting the sample based on purity and completeness, in order to allow users to tailor the sample according to their specific needs.
Roster, W., Salvato, M., Buchner, J., Shirley, R., Lusso, E., Landt, H., et al. (2026). Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1): XVI. Optical and near-infrared identification and classification of point-like X-ray selected sources. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 711, 1-25 [10.1051/0004-6361/202554616].
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1078672
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.