This paper evaluates the operationalisation of explainability requirements under the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). The study evaluates, under a legal informatics perspective, the consistency of current standardisation initiatives with the Act’s definitions, general objectives, and resilience to technological innovation. The research identifies critical structural gaps in explainability along the value chain by noting that linear information transfers from providers to deployers often fail to provide meaningful understanding for affected individuals. Furthermore, the paper highlights a significant challenge posed by emerging “agentic AI” systems, which challenge current standards that focus on static input-output mappings rather than autonomous, sequential decision-making. The analysis suggests that a static view of standardisation under the New Legislative Framework (NLF) risks technical obsolescence and may undermine the protection of fundamental rights. To ensure long-term regulatory effectiveness, the study advocates for modular, layered explainability architectures that can adapt to the evolving needs of diverse stakeholders across the system lifecycle.

Sapienza, S., Palmirani, M. (2026). Explainability, Standardisation, and the AI Act. Cham : Springer [10.1007/978-3-032-34304-8_1].

Explainability, Standardisation, and the AI Act

Sapienza, Salvatore
;
Palmirani, Monica
2026

Abstract

This paper evaluates the operationalisation of explainability requirements under the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). The study evaluates, under a legal informatics perspective, the consistency of current standardisation initiatives with the Act’s definitions, general objectives, and resilience to technological innovation. The research identifies critical structural gaps in explainability along the value chain by noting that linear information transfers from providers to deployers often fail to provide meaningful understanding for affected individuals. Furthermore, the paper highlights a significant challenge posed by emerging “agentic AI” systems, which challenge current standards that focus on static input-output mappings rather than autonomous, sequential decision-making. The analysis suggests that a static view of standardisation under the New Legislative Framework (NLF) risks technical obsolescence and may undermine the protection of fundamental rights. To ensure long-term regulatory effectiveness, the study advocates for modular, layered explainability architectures that can adapt to the evolving needs of diverse stakeholders across the system lifecycle.
2026
Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2026.
3
17
Sapienza, S., Palmirani, M. (2026). Explainability, Standardisation, and the AI Act. Cham : Springer [10.1007/978-3-032-34304-8_1].
Sapienza, Salvatore; Palmirani, Monica
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1076613
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact