Evaluating the reliability of the 1-meter resolution meta-estimated global canopy height map for estimating forest structural metrics in Alpine environment

Monitoring forests globally through the assessment of structural characteristics is indispensable in times of increasing disturbances and biodiversity loss. The recent development of a 1-meter resolution Global Canopy Height Map by Meta and the World Resources Institute (Meta/WRI CHM) offers new opportunities for large-scale forest structure analysis. However, its reliability for estimating key forest structural metrics in selected forest sites of the Italian Alps remains largely untested. In this study, we compared estimates of canopy cover, mean and maximum canopy height, tree count, and crown size computed from the Meta/WRI CHM with the corresponding metrics computed from airborne laser scanning (ALS)-based CHMs across five forested sites in Alpine ecosystems representing diverse forest structures, species compositions, and management practices. Our results show that the Meta/WRI CHM provides reliable estimates of canopy cover (R2 = 0.82–0.92, RMSE = 8%–15%) and, to some extent, mean canopy height (R2 = 0.69–0.85, RMSE = 2.2–2.9 m). However, it substantially underestimates maximum canopy height and fails to reliably estimate tree count, positions, and crown size, overestimating the number of trees by 200–750 per hectare. In addition, the quality of the evaluated metrics estimates varied with respect to topographic gradients (i.e., slope, aspect, and altitude). Our findings define clear application boundaries for the Meta/WRI CHM in Alpine forest environments: while the product can support stand-level estimates of canopy cover and mean canopy height, it remains unsuitable for estimating maximum canopy height and individual-tree-level metrics such as tree count, tree position, and crown size. Future efforts should focus on refining global CHMs to improve accuracy and expand their applicability for forest monitoring.