Classroom communication depends on talker-listener distance, room acoustics, and background noise, yet these factors are rarely examined jointly in both speech production and perception. This study investigated how dis tance, room acoustics, and bone-conducted masking affect vocal adaptation and speech intelligibility in two university lecture halls (acoustically treated vs. untreated). Twenty-four adults alternated as talkers and listeners, producing speech at three distances (5, 10, 15 m) under three masking conditions (none, low, high). Voice power level, fundamental frequency, pitch variability, and phonation time ratio were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and intelligibility using a binomial generalized mixed model. Voice power increased by 1.76 dB per dou bling of distance, and fundamental frequency increased by 91.57 cents relative to each talker's baseline value, indicating systematic spatial compensation across room and noise conditions, independent of room characteris tics. Masking elicited Lombard-like increases in voice power (5.15 dB low; 8.14 dB high), with a room-dependent slope (approximate to 0.34 dB/dB in the treated room vs. approximate to 0.22 dB/dB in the untreated room). Intelligibility declined with distance (OR = 0.55 per doubling), background noise (OR = 0.40 low; 0.20 high), and in the untreated hall (OR = 0.55). Production adjustments did not fully compensate for perceptual losses, highlighting the importance of acoustic design and noise control in educational spaces.

Bottalico, P., Tardini, V., Guastamacchia, A., Astolfi, A. (2026). Speech production and perception across distance in acoustically treated and untreated university lecture halls. APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 254, 111437-111437 [10.1016/j.apacoust.2026.111437].

Speech production and perception across distance in acoustically treated and untreated university lecture halls

Bottalico P.
;
Tardini V.;
2026

Abstract

Classroom communication depends on talker-listener distance, room acoustics, and background noise, yet these factors are rarely examined jointly in both speech production and perception. This study investigated how dis tance, room acoustics, and bone-conducted masking affect vocal adaptation and speech intelligibility in two university lecture halls (acoustically treated vs. untreated). Twenty-four adults alternated as talkers and listeners, producing speech at three distances (5, 10, 15 m) under three masking conditions (none, low, high). Voice power level, fundamental frequency, pitch variability, and phonation time ratio were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and intelligibility using a binomial generalized mixed model. Voice power increased by 1.76 dB per dou bling of distance, and fundamental frequency increased by 91.57 cents relative to each talker's baseline value, indicating systematic spatial compensation across room and noise conditions, independent of room characteris tics. Masking elicited Lombard-like increases in voice power (5.15 dB low; 8.14 dB high), with a room-dependent slope (approximate to 0.34 dB/dB in the treated room vs. approximate to 0.22 dB/dB in the untreated room). Intelligibility declined with distance (OR = 0.55 per doubling), background noise (OR = 0.40 low; 0.20 high), and in the untreated hall (OR = 0.55). Production adjustments did not fully compensate for perceptual losses, highlighting the importance of acoustic design and noise control in educational spaces.
2026
Bottalico, P., Tardini, V., Guastamacchia, A., Astolfi, A. (2026). Speech production and perception across distance in acoustically treated and untreated university lecture halls. APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 254, 111437-111437 [10.1016/j.apacoust.2026.111437].
Bottalico, P.; Tardini, V.; Guastamacchia, A.; Astolfi, A.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1072530
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact