We collected thirty fallen off fragments of palm-leaf manuscripts (PLM), from four manuscript collections. Aiming to identify grasses used in the 18-19 centuries for PLM preparation, we analysed these samples for grass silica short cell phytoliths (GSSCP). Due to the complex, diverse phytolith sources and limited literature, we first examined reference grass material from herbaria collected in South India and SE Asia with comparable climates. Material from thirty grass species across six subfamilies was studied. In total, 36 GSSCP phytolith morphotypes were described; subfamily-specific assemblages were identified. All individual morphotypes were analysed for positive and negative co-occurrence patterns, which were then used in the interpretation of the results of phytolith analysis of the PLM samples. We revealed 28 GSSCPs in PLM samples. Preservation of the phytolith material varied from sufficient to low. Many cells demonstrated abnormal morphology, and some GSSCPs were forced into the surface of the palm leaves, mechanically broken, half-brushed off and eroded, providing evidence of active mechanical forces applied to the surface of PLMs during their production. In PLM samples provenancing from Kerala, Arundo donax, Phragmites sp., Bambuseae, and Chloridoideae (most likely Desmostachya bipinnata) were revealed. In PLM samples from Tamil Nadu, Phragmites sp., domestic rice (possibly with admixture of Arundinoideae and/or Chloridoideae), and Panicoideae material were evidenced. Evidence of Aristida sp. is most likely attributed to historical contamination. The main difference in the PLM samples reflects the amount of preserved material historically accumulated on the folio surfaces as well as the original provenance of the PLMs.

Poliakova, A., Ciotti, G., Blinnikov, M. (2026). Historical use of grasses in South Indian palm-leaf manuscript production reconstructed from phytolith analysis. REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY, 352, 1-24 [10.1016/j.revpalbo.2026.105610].

Historical use of grasses in South Indian palm-leaf manuscript production reconstructed from phytolith analysis

Ciotti, Giovanni;
2026

Abstract

We collected thirty fallen off fragments of palm-leaf manuscripts (PLM), from four manuscript collections. Aiming to identify grasses used in the 18-19 centuries for PLM preparation, we analysed these samples for grass silica short cell phytoliths (GSSCP). Due to the complex, diverse phytolith sources and limited literature, we first examined reference grass material from herbaria collected in South India and SE Asia with comparable climates. Material from thirty grass species across six subfamilies was studied. In total, 36 GSSCP phytolith morphotypes were described; subfamily-specific assemblages were identified. All individual morphotypes were analysed for positive and negative co-occurrence patterns, which were then used in the interpretation of the results of phytolith analysis of the PLM samples. We revealed 28 GSSCPs in PLM samples. Preservation of the phytolith material varied from sufficient to low. Many cells demonstrated abnormal morphology, and some GSSCPs were forced into the surface of the palm leaves, mechanically broken, half-brushed off and eroded, providing evidence of active mechanical forces applied to the surface of PLMs during their production. In PLM samples provenancing from Kerala, Arundo donax, Phragmites sp., Bambuseae, and Chloridoideae (most likely Desmostachya bipinnata) were revealed. In PLM samples from Tamil Nadu, Phragmites sp., domestic rice (possibly with admixture of Arundinoideae and/or Chloridoideae), and Panicoideae material were evidenced. Evidence of Aristida sp. is most likely attributed to historical contamination. The main difference in the PLM samples reflects the amount of preserved material historically accumulated on the folio surfaces as well as the original provenance of the PLMs.
2026
Poliakova, A., Ciotti, G., Blinnikov, M. (2026). Historical use of grasses in South Indian palm-leaf manuscript production reconstructed from phytolith analysis. REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY, 352, 1-24 [10.1016/j.revpalbo.2026.105610].
Poliakova, Anastasia; Ciotti, Giovanni; Blinnikov, Mikhail
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1063632
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact