In this paper, we analyze the interoperability landscape for materials and manufacturing in a broad sense and with a particular focus in the context of data. To set the stage and give an overview of the various facets of this topic, we collect and compare existing definitions and classifications of interoperability (its types, layers, levels) and summarize recommendations from various entities and communities. After this, we carry out an analysis on a set of interoperability scenarios, propose a broad structure of requirements for interoperability, and list some key components that can be used to meet these requirements, with a particular emphasis on the role of semantic technologies and knowledge representation. Finally, we highlight future challenges and suggest directions for best practices. Throughout the paper, we emphasize common points and differences in the landscape. Through this process, relevant dimensions are identified, and various tables are provided with useful syntheses and structured categorizations that can serve as a base for future theoretical work, as well as immediate practical guidance (e.g., for requirements gathering, literature navigation).

Chiacchiera, S., Breslin, J., Correia, A.T., Friis, J., Ghedini, E., Goldbeck, G., et al. (2026). An analysis of interoperability in materials and manufacturing: Definitions, classifications, requirements, and recommendations. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION INTEGRATION, 51, 1-31 [10.1016/j.jii.2026.101116].

An analysis of interoperability in materials and manufacturing: Definitions, classifications, requirements, and recommendations

Ghedini, Emanuele;Paponetti, Ilaria Maria;Zaccarini, Francesco Antonio
2026

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the interoperability landscape for materials and manufacturing in a broad sense and with a particular focus in the context of data. To set the stage and give an overview of the various facets of this topic, we collect and compare existing definitions and classifications of interoperability (its types, layers, levels) and summarize recommendations from various entities and communities. After this, we carry out an analysis on a set of interoperability scenarios, propose a broad structure of requirements for interoperability, and list some key components that can be used to meet these requirements, with a particular emphasis on the role of semantic technologies and knowledge representation. Finally, we highlight future challenges and suggest directions for best practices. Throughout the paper, we emphasize common points and differences in the landscape. Through this process, relevant dimensions are identified, and various tables are provided with useful syntheses and structured categorizations that can serve as a base for future theoretical work, as well as immediate practical guidance (e.g., for requirements gathering, literature navigation).
2026
Chiacchiera, S., Breslin, J., Correia, A.T., Friis, J., Ghedini, E., Goldbeck, G., et al. (2026). An analysis of interoperability in materials and manufacturing: Definitions, classifications, requirements, and recommendations. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION INTEGRATION, 51, 1-31 [10.1016/j.jii.2026.101116].
Chiacchiera, Silvia; Breslin, John; Correia, Ana Teresa; Friis, Jesper; Ghedini, Emanuele; Goldbeck, Gerhard; Horsch, Martin Thomas; Karray, Mohamed H...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1061453
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact