Visuo–Vestibular Virtual Reality-Based Training for People with Stroke: A Feasibility Study

Background/Objectives: Stroke frequently leads to balance deficits. Vestibular physical therapy (VPT) may enhance postural control through neuroplastic mechanisms. Virtual reality (VR) can provide ecologically valid environments for rehabilitation, increasing patient engagement. Methods: In this randomized feasibility study, nine individuals with chronic stroke were randomized to either a Real visuo–vestibular rehabilitation group (n = 6) or a Sham VR group (n = 3) to explore the feasibility of the protocol and randomization procedures rather than to compare clinical efficacy. Both groups were trained in immersive VR environments for 12 sessions. The Real group experienced visuo–vestibular stimuli requiring sensorimotor integration; the Sham group trained in the same environments without such stimuli. Feasibility was assessed through attendance, participation (Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale, PRPS), and user satisfaction (USEQ). Safety and acceptability were monitored through adverse event reporting. Secondary exploratory outcomes included measures of balance—the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBESTest), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)—as well as functional independence (Barthel Index), health-related quality of life (Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale, SSQoL), and a set of spatiotemporal and gait quality parameters derived from inertial measurement unit (IMU) data collected during the 10-Meter Walk Test and the Figure of 8 Walk Test. Results: All participants completed the protocol without adverse events. Participation, as measured by the PRPS, remained consistently high across sessions (mean ≥5.7/6), while USEQ scores indicated excellent user satisfaction (mean ≥28/30). Exploratory analyses revealed improvements in MiniBESTest and BBS scores for the Real group. Instrumental measures derived from IMUs demonstrated improvements across groups. Conclusions: Exploratory outcomes suggested positive trends in balance improvements, and the integration of clinical scales with wearable sensors proved feasible and informative.