Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
This paper describes the objectives, design, and findings of the pre-launch ground characterisation campaigns of the Euclid infrared detectors. The aim of the ground characterisations is to evaluate the performance of the detectors, to calibrate the pixel response, and to derive the pixel response correction methods. The detectors have been tested and characterised in the facilities set up for this purpose. The pixel properties, including baseline, bad pixels, quantum efficiency, inter pixel capacitance, quantum efficiency, dark current, readout noise, conversion gain, response non-linearity, and image persistence were measured and characterised for each pixel. We describe in detail the test flow definition that allows us to derive the pixel properties and we present the data acquisition and data quality check software implemented for this purpose. We also outline the measurement protocols of all the pixel properties presented and we provide a comprehensive overview of the performance of the Euclid infrared detectors as derived after tuning the operating parameters of the detectors. The main conclusion of this work is that the performance of the infrared detectors Euclid meets the requirements. Pixels classified as non-functioning accounted for less than 0.2% of all science pixels. The interpixel capacitance (IPC) coupling is minimal, the cross-talk between adjacent pixels is less than 1% between adjacent pixels, and 95% of the pixels show a quantum efficienty (QE) greater than 80% across the entire spectral range of the Euclid mission. The conversion gain is approximately 0.52 ADU/e-, with a variation of less than 1% between channels of the same detector. The reset noise is approximately equal to 23 ADU rms after reference pixel correction. The readout noise of a single frame is approximately 13 e- rms while the signal estimator noise is measured at 7 e- rms in photometric mode and 9 e- rms in spectroscopic acquisition mode. The deviation from linear response at signal levels up to 80 ke- is less than 5% for 95% of the pixels. Median persistence amplitudes are less than 0.3% of the signal, though persistence exhibits significant spatial variation and differences between detectors.
Kubik, B., Barbier, R., Clemens, J., Ferriol, S., Secroun, A., Smadja, G., et al. (2026). Euclid preparation: LXXX. Overview of Euclid infrared detector performance from ground tests. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 707, 1-25 [10.1051/0004-6361/202555777].
Euclid preparation: LXXX. Overview of Euclid infrared detector performance from ground tests
B. Kubik;R. Barbier;J. Clemens;S. Ferriol;A. Secroun;G. Smadja;W. Gillard;N. Fourmanoit;A. Ealet;S. Conseil;J. Zoubian;R. Kohley;J. -C. Salvignol;L. Conversi;T. Maciaszek;H. Cho;W. Holmes;M. Seiffert;A. Waczynski;S. Wachter;K. Jahnke;F. Grupp;C. Bonoli;L. Corcione;S. Dusini;E. Medinaceli;R. Laureijs;G. D. Racca;A. Bonnefoi;M. Carle;A. Costille;F. Ducret;J-L. Gimenez;D. Le Mignant;L. Martin;L. Caillat;L. Valenziano;N. Auricchio;P. Battaglia;A. Derosa;R. Farinelli;F. Cogato;G. Morgante;M. Trifoglio;V. Capobianco;S. Ligori;E. Borsato;C. Sirignano;L. Stanco;S. Ventura;R. Toledo-Moreo;L. Patrizii;Y. Copin;R. Foltz;E. Prieto;N. Aghanim;B. Altieri;S. Andreon;C. Baccigalupi;M. Baldi;A. Balestra;S. Bardelli;F. Bernardeau;A. Biviano;A. Bonchi;E. Branchini;M. Brescia;J. Brinchmann;S. Camera;G. Ca??as-Herrera;C. Carbone;J. Carretero;S. Casas;F. J. Castander;M. Castellano;G. Castignani;S. Cavuoti;K. C. Chambers;A. Cimatti;C. Colodro-Conde;G. Congedo;C. J. Conselice;F. Courbin;H. M. Courtois;A. Da Silva;R. da Silva;H. Degaudenzi;G. De Lucia;A. M. Di Giorgio;H. Dole;M. Douspis;F. Dubath;C. A. J. Duncan;X. Dupac;S. Escoffier;M. Farina;F. Faustini;F. Finelli;S. Fotopoulou;M. Frailis;E. Franceschi;M. Fumana;S. Galeotta;B. Gillis;C. Giocoli;J. Gracia-Carpio;B. R. Granett;A. Grazian;L. Guzzo;S. V. H. Haugan;J. Hoar;H. Hoekstra;I. M. Hook;F. Hormuth;A. Hornstrup;P. Hudelot;M. Jhabvala;E. Keih??nen;S. Kermiche;A. Kiessling;M. K??mmel;M. Kunz;H. Kurki-Suonio;Q. Le Boulc???h;A. M. C. Le Brun;P. Liebing;P. B. Lilje;V. Lindholm;I. Lloro;G. Mainetti;D. Maino;E. Maiorano;O. Mansutti;S. Marcin;O. Marggraf;M. Martinelli;N. Martinet;F. Marulli;R. Massey;S. Maurogordato;H. J. McCracken;S. Mei;M. Melchior;Y. Mellier;M. Meneghetti;E. Merlin;G. Meylan;A. Mora;M. Moresco;P. W. Morris;L. Moscardini;R. Nakajima;C. Neissner;R. C. Nichol;S. -M. Niemi;C. Padilla;S. Paltani;F. Pasian;K. Pedersen;W. J. Percival;V. Pettorino;S. Pires;G. Polenta;M. Poncet;L. A. Popa;L. Pozzetti;F. Raison;R. Rebolo;A. Renzi;J. Rhodes;G. Riccio;E. Romelli;M. Roncarelli;E. Rossetti;R. Saglia;Z. Sakr;D. Sapone;B. Sartoris;J. A. Schewtschenko;M. Schirmer;P. Schneider;T. Schrabback;M. Scodeggio;E. Sefusatti;G. Seidel;S. Serrano;P. Simon;G. Sirri;J. Steinwagner;P. Tallada-Cresp??;D. Tavagnacco;A. N. Taylor;H. I. Teplitz;I. Tereno;S. Toft;F. Torradeflot;A. Tsyganov;I. Tutusaus;J. Valiviita;T. Vassallo;G. Verdoes Kleijn;A. Veropalumbo;Y. Wang;J. Weller;A. Zacchei;G. Zamorani;F. M. Zerbi;E. Zucca;V. Allevato;M. Ballardini;M. Bolzonella;E. Bozzo;C. Burigana;R. Cabanac;A. Cappi;P. Casenove;D. Di Ferdinando;J. A. Escartin Vigo;L. Gabarra;W. G. Hartley;J. Mart??n-Fleitas;S. Matthew;N. Mauri;R. B. Metcalf;A. Pezzotta;M. P??ntinen;C. Porciani;I. Risso;V. Scottez;M. Sereno;M. Tenti;M. Viel;M. Wiesmann;Y. Akrami;I. T. Andika;S. Anselmi;M. Archidiacono;F. Atrio-Barandela;D. Bertacca;M. Bethermin;A. Blanchard;L. Blot;S. Borgani;M. L. Brown;S. Bruton;A. Calabro;B. Camacho Quevedo;F. Caro;C. S. Carvalho;T. Castro;Y. Charles;R. Chary;A. R. Cooray;O. Cucciati;S. Davini;F. De Paolis;G. Desprez;A. D??az-S??nchez;S. Di Domizio;J. M. Diego;P. Dimauro;A. Enia;Y. Fang;A. M. N. Ferguson;A. G. Ferrari;A. Finoguenov;A. Fontana;A. Franco;K. Ganga;J. Garc??a-Bellido;T. Gasparetto;V. Gautard;E. Gaztanaga;F. Giacomini;F. Gianotti;G. Gozaliasl;M. Guidi;C. M. Gutierrez;A. Hall;H. Hildebrandt;J. Hjorth;J. J. E. Kajava;Y. Kang;V. Kansal;D. Karagiannis;K. Kiiveri;C. C. Kirkpatrick;S. Kruk;J. Le Graet;L. Legrand;M. Lembo;F. Lepori;G. Leroy;G. F. Lesci;J. Lesgourgues;L. Leuzzi;T. I. Liaudat;A. Loureiro;J. Macias-Perez;G. Maggio;M. Magliocchetti;C. Mancini;F. Mannucci;R. Maoli;C. J. A. P. Martins;L. Maurin;M. Miluzio;P. Monaco;A. Montoro;C. Moretti;C. Murray;S. Nadathur;K. Naidoo;A. Navarro-Alsina;F. Passalacqua;K. Paterson;A. Pisani;D. Potter;S. Quai;M. Radovich;P. -F. Rocci;S. Sacquegna;M. Sahl??n;D. B. Sanders;E. Sarpa;A. Schneider;D. Sciotti;E. Sellentin;G. Setnikar;L. C. Smith;K. Tanidis;C. Tao;G. Testera;R. Teyssier;S. Tosi;A. Troja;M. Tucci;C. Valieri;A. Venhola;D. Vergani;G. Verza;J. R. Weaver;L. Zalesky
2026
Abstract
This paper describes the objectives, design, and findings of the pre-launch ground characterisation campaigns of the Euclid infrared detectors. The aim of the ground characterisations is to evaluate the performance of the detectors, to calibrate the pixel response, and to derive the pixel response correction methods. The detectors have been tested and characterised in the facilities set up for this purpose. The pixel properties, including baseline, bad pixels, quantum efficiency, inter pixel capacitance, quantum efficiency, dark current, readout noise, conversion gain, response non-linearity, and image persistence were measured and characterised for each pixel. We describe in detail the test flow definition that allows us to derive the pixel properties and we present the data acquisition and data quality check software implemented for this purpose. We also outline the measurement protocols of all the pixel properties presented and we provide a comprehensive overview of the performance of the Euclid infrared detectors as derived after tuning the operating parameters of the detectors. The main conclusion of this work is that the performance of the infrared detectors Euclid meets the requirements. Pixels classified as non-functioning accounted for less than 0.2% of all science pixels. The interpixel capacitance (IPC) coupling is minimal, the cross-talk between adjacent pixels is less than 1% between adjacent pixels, and 95% of the pixels show a quantum efficienty (QE) greater than 80% across the entire spectral range of the Euclid mission. The conversion gain is approximately 0.52 ADU/e-, with a variation of less than 1% between channels of the same detector. The reset noise is approximately equal to 23 ADU rms after reference pixel correction. The readout noise of a single frame is approximately 13 e- rms while the signal estimator noise is measured at 7 e- rms in photometric mode and 9 e- rms in spectroscopic acquisition mode. The deviation from linear response at signal levels up to 80 ke- is less than 5% for 95% of the pixels. Median persistence amplitudes are less than 0.3% of the signal, though persistence exhibits significant spatial variation and differences between detectors.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1057170
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
0
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.