Sustainable energy systems demand energy-dense, scalable, manufacturable, and readily integrable lithium-ion batteries, yet available literature provides fragmented comparisons of commercial cell formats. Here we report a unified, industrially grounded benchmarking framework for cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic cells using parameters selected for high-fidelity derivability across formats and direct relevance to manufacturing and system integration. At cell level, active/inactive volume allocation, gravimetric and volumetric energy densities, and assembly complexity are quantified. At pack level, we evaluate nominal voltage and capacity, pack energy, gravimetric cell-to-pack ratio, cooling, and structural integration descriptors. Chemistry-dependent single-cell and pack-scaled costs are estimated from prospective cost trajectories. Fast-charging capability, resistance growth and aging, and quantitative thermal performance are excluded due to noncomparable datasets; pack thermal implications are discussed qualitatively. The framework shows cylindrical lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide cells maximizes cell-level energy density but increases structural overhead, whereas lithium iron phosphate blade designs maximize cell-to-pack ratio, pack volumetric energy, and cost competitiveness.
De Santis, M., Giusti, I., Poli, F., Piancastelli, L., Liverani, A. (2026). Design and production trade-offs in lithium-ion batteries from cell formats to electric vehicles. CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 7(3), 1-22 [10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103162].
Design and production trade-offs in lithium-ion batteries from cell formats to electric vehicles
De Santis, Marella
;Giusti, Irene;Poli, Federico;Piancastelli, Luca;Liverani, Alfredo
2026
Abstract
Sustainable energy systems demand energy-dense, scalable, manufacturable, and readily integrable lithium-ion batteries, yet available literature provides fragmented comparisons of commercial cell formats. Here we report a unified, industrially grounded benchmarking framework for cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic cells using parameters selected for high-fidelity derivability across formats and direct relevance to manufacturing and system integration. At cell level, active/inactive volume allocation, gravimetric and volumetric energy densities, and assembly complexity are quantified. At pack level, we evaluate nominal voltage and capacity, pack energy, gravimetric cell-to-pack ratio, cooling, and structural integration descriptors. Chemistry-dependent single-cell and pack-scaled costs are estimated from prospective cost trajectories. Fast-charging capability, resistance growth and aging, and quantitative thermal performance are excluded due to noncomparable datasets; pack thermal implications are discussed qualitatively. The framework shows cylindrical lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide cells maximizes cell-level energy density but increases structural overhead, whereas lithium iron phosphate blade designs maximize cell-to-pack ratio, pack volumetric energy, and cost competitiveness.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PIIS2666386426000688.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Main Text
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
6.66 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.66 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
ScienceDirect_files_19May2026_10-09-51.184.zip
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
15 MB
Formato
Zip File
|
15 MB | Zip File | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



