Sustainable energy systems demand energy-dense, scalable, manufacturable, and readily integrable lithium-ion batteries, yet available literature provides fragmented comparisons of commercial cell formats. Here we report a unified, industrially grounded benchmarking framework for cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic cells using parameters selected for high-fidelity derivability across formats and direct relevance to manufacturing and system integration. At cell level, active/inactive volume allocation, gravimetric and volumetric energy densities, and assembly complexity are quantified. At pack level, we evaluate nominal voltage and capacity, pack energy, gravimetric cell-to-pack ratio, cooling, and structural integration descriptors. Chemistry-dependent single-cell and pack-scaled costs are estimated from prospective cost trajectories. Fast-charging capability, resistance growth and aging, and quantitative thermal performance are excluded due to noncomparable datasets; pack thermal implications are discussed qualitatively. The framework shows cylindrical lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide cells maximizes cell-level energy density but increases structural overhead, whereas lithium iron phosphate blade designs maximize cell-to-pack ratio, pack volumetric energy, and cost competitiveness.

De Santis, M., Giusti, I., Poli, F., Piancastelli, L., Liverani, A. (2026). Design and production trade-offs in lithium-ion batteries from cell formats to electric vehicles. CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 7(3), 1-22 [10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103162].

Design and production trade-offs in lithium-ion batteries from cell formats to electric vehicles

De Santis, Marella
;
Giusti, Irene;Poli, Federico;Piancastelli, Luca;Liverani, Alfredo
2026

Abstract

Sustainable energy systems demand energy-dense, scalable, manufacturable, and readily integrable lithium-ion batteries, yet available literature provides fragmented comparisons of commercial cell formats. Here we report a unified, industrially grounded benchmarking framework for cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic cells using parameters selected for high-fidelity derivability across formats and direct relevance to manufacturing and system integration. At cell level, active/inactive volume allocation, gravimetric and volumetric energy densities, and assembly complexity are quantified. At pack level, we evaluate nominal voltage and capacity, pack energy, gravimetric cell-to-pack ratio, cooling, and structural integration descriptors. Chemistry-dependent single-cell and pack-scaled costs are estimated from prospective cost trajectories. Fast-charging capability, resistance growth and aging, and quantitative thermal performance are excluded due to noncomparable datasets; pack thermal implications are discussed qualitatively. The framework shows cylindrical lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide cells maximizes cell-level energy density but increases structural overhead, whereas lithium iron phosphate blade designs maximize cell-to-pack ratio, pack volumetric energy, and cost competitiveness.
2026
De Santis, M., Giusti, I., Poli, F., Piancastelli, L., Liverani, A. (2026). Design and production trade-offs in lithium-ion batteries from cell formats to electric vehicles. CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 7(3), 1-22 [10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103162].
De Santis, Marella; Giusti, Irene; Poli, Federico; Piancastelli, Luca; Liverani, Alfredo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS2666386426000688.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Main Text
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.66 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
ScienceDirect_files_19May2026_10-09-51.184.zip

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 15 MB
Formato Zip File
15 MB Zip File Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1054470
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact