This article examines Theodor W. Adorno’s engagement with Freudian psychoanalysis, especially in the late 1940s and in the early 1950s. It argues that Adorno developed a powerful psychoanalytic interpretation of fascist mass phenomena, based on Freud’s theory of identification. At the same time, he exposed the limitations of purely psychological explanations of social domination. The paper reconstructs Adorno’s critique of two major attempts to integrate psychology and sociology: revisionist psychoanalysis (notably Karen Horney), and Talcott Parsons’ theory of social action. In both cases, Adorno rejects integration as theoretically misleading and politically conformist, contending that it neutralizes the critical potential of psychoanalysis. According to Adorno, Freud is “right where he is wrong”: his psychological one-sidedness preserves a critical insight into social power that is obscured by later sociological corrections. The article concludes by identifying immanent tensions in Adorno’s own position, particularly his underestimation of Freud’s dialectical concept of reality and of psychoanalytic practice. It suggests that these neglected dimensions could have strengthened Adorno’s critical project.
Santarelli, M. (2026). Adorno and Freud. Integration as a political problem. STUDI DI ESTETICA, 54(4 Special Issue), 155-168.
Adorno and Freud. Integration as a political problem
Santarelli Matteo
2026
Abstract
This article examines Theodor W. Adorno’s engagement with Freudian psychoanalysis, especially in the late 1940s and in the early 1950s. It argues that Adorno developed a powerful psychoanalytic interpretation of fascist mass phenomena, based on Freud’s theory of identification. At the same time, he exposed the limitations of purely psychological explanations of social domination. The paper reconstructs Adorno’s critique of two major attempts to integrate psychology and sociology: revisionist psychoanalysis (notably Karen Horney), and Talcott Parsons’ theory of social action. In both cases, Adorno rejects integration as theoretically misleading and politically conformist, contending that it neutralizes the critical potential of psychoanalysis. According to Adorno, Freud is “right where he is wrong”: his psychological one-sidedness preserves a critical insight into social power that is obscured by later sociological corrections. The article concludes by identifying immanent tensions in Adorno’s own position, particularly his underestimation of Freud’s dialectical concept of reality and of psychoanalytic practice. It suggests that these neglected dimensions could have strengthened Adorno’s critical project.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
freud adorno 2026.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
205.6 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
205.6 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



