Evolving asylum deterrence practices in Africa: The case of Tunisia and South Africa

Tunisia and South Africa are characterized by important geographical, linguistic, historical and legal differences that have contributed to shaping the right to asylum differently at the national level. Despite these differences, both countries have embraced a restrictive approach to the right to asylum in recent years, implementing deterrence norms, policies and practices. This contribution offers an overview of some of the most prominent barriers to asylum in these two countries and indicates key factors that are helpful to explain why Tunisia and South Africa, despite being poles apart in many respects, have equally implemented asylum deterrence measures.