This chapter introduces complexity theory into pragmatics and discourse studies by framing cultural semiospheres as systems structured by double binds and paradoxes . Discourse practices are described as adaptive mediations that negotiate tensions between systemic order and environmental contingency, managing structural, mereological, stochastic, and scalar forms of complexity. The author argues that meaning emerges from recursive inter-observation among institutions of sense and from the non-linearity of interaction. An ecological paradigm underpins this approach, highlighting the coupling between subjects and their environments, including bodily and psychological dimensions. Modalities are identified as key operators that both expand possible worlds and stabilize communicative frames through dialogical processes. Complexity thus requires a “simplex” theoretical strategy capable of accounting for indeterminacy without dissolving analytical rigor. Ultimately, discourse is presented as a dynamic field where law and chance, necessity and contingency, remain dialectically intertwined.
Basso, P. (2022). Introduction to complexity, pragmatics and discourse. Berlin : Language Science Press [10.5281/zenodo.6620113].
Introduction to complexity, pragmatics and discourse
Pierluigi Basso Fossali
2022
Abstract
This chapter introduces complexity theory into pragmatics and discourse studies by framing cultural semiospheres as systems structured by double binds and paradoxes . Discourse practices are described as adaptive mediations that negotiate tensions between systemic order and environmental contingency, managing structural, mereological, stochastic, and scalar forms of complexity. The author argues that meaning emerges from recursive inter-observation among institutions of sense and from the non-linearity of interaction. An ecological paradigm underpins this approach, highlighting the coupling between subjects and their environments, including bodily and psychological dimensions. Modalities are identified as key operators that both expand possible worlds and stabilize communicative frames through dialogical processes. Complexity thus requires a “simplex” theoretical strategy capable of accounting for indeterminacy without dissolving analytical rigor. Ultimately, discourse is presented as a dynamic field where law and chance, necessity and contingency, remain dialectically intertwined.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
334-Lund-et-al-2022-5.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Capitolo
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
73.88 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
73.88 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


