IntroductionManaging atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant patients poses a challenge for both nephrologists and cardiologists. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in this patient's cohort is scarce.Methods and resultsIn this two-center prospective study, we included all consecutive kidney transplant patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation between April 2017 and March 2022. A 1:3 propensity score matching created a control group of non-transplant AF patients undergoing ablation. We included 16 kidney transplant patients and 48 matched controls. Ablation was successful in all patients. The periprocedural complication rate (6.3% in the kidney transplant group vs. 6.3% in the control group, p value = 1) did not differ between the two groups. One transplant patient experienced graft dysfunction after a complication. At 18 months, AF recurrence-fee rates were 69% in the transplant group and 70.1% in controls (p = 0.95). By the last follow-up, all transplant patients had discontinued antiarrhythmic drugs, while 19.6% of the patients in the control group were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.09). Kidney function in the transplant group remained stable (eGFR 32 [23.8, 40.5] ml/min/1.73 m2 before vs. 34 [29.8, 38] ml/min/1.73 m2 at last follow up, p = 0.93).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that catheter ablation is a viable option for treating AF in kidney transplant patients, with comparable outcomes to non-transplanted individuals. Discontinuing antiarrhythmic drugs reduces drug interaction risks, but minimizing procedural complications remains critical to preserving graft function.

Keelani, A., Bartoli, L., Gasperetti, A., Popescu, S., Schiavone, M., Traub, A., et al. (2025). Safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in kidney transplant patients. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 68(5), 1017-1026 [10.1007/s10840-025-02006-x].

Safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in kidney transplant patients

Bartoli L.;
2025

Abstract

IntroductionManaging atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant patients poses a challenge for both nephrologists and cardiologists. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in this patient's cohort is scarce.Methods and resultsIn this two-center prospective study, we included all consecutive kidney transplant patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation between April 2017 and March 2022. A 1:3 propensity score matching created a control group of non-transplant AF patients undergoing ablation. We included 16 kidney transplant patients and 48 matched controls. Ablation was successful in all patients. The periprocedural complication rate (6.3% in the kidney transplant group vs. 6.3% in the control group, p value = 1) did not differ between the two groups. One transplant patient experienced graft dysfunction after a complication. At 18 months, AF recurrence-fee rates were 69% in the transplant group and 70.1% in controls (p = 0.95). By the last follow-up, all transplant patients had discontinued antiarrhythmic drugs, while 19.6% of the patients in the control group were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.09). Kidney function in the transplant group remained stable (eGFR 32 [23.8, 40.5] ml/min/1.73 m2 before vs. 34 [29.8, 38] ml/min/1.73 m2 at last follow up, p = 0.93).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that catheter ablation is a viable option for treating AF in kidney transplant patients, with comparable outcomes to non-transplanted individuals. Discontinuing antiarrhythmic drugs reduces drug interaction risks, but minimizing procedural complications remains critical to preserving graft function.
2025
Keelani, A., Bartoli, L., Gasperetti, A., Popescu, S., Schiavone, M., Traub, A., et al. (2025). Safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in kidney transplant patients. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 68(5), 1017-1026 [10.1007/s10840-025-02006-x].
Keelani, A.; Bartoli, L.; Gasperetti, A.; Popescu, S.; Schiavone, M.; Traub, A.; Phan, H. -L.; Feher, M.; Fink, T.; Sciacca, V.; Nitschke, M.; Vogler,...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream-1897363333.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 662.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
662.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
10840_2025_2006_MOESM1_ESM.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 14.18 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
14.18 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1050489
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact