Correction: Riccò et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A WAidid Consensus Document on New Preventive Options. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1317

The authors would like to make the following corrections to this published paper [1]. In the original publication, there was a mistake in Figure 4 as published. Factual inaccuracies in Figure 4 were corrected. In fact, actual data do not support difference in efficacy between the respective vaccines as the primary endpoints from the clinical trials have been defined differently, and therefore no comparison between vaccines is appropriate, also taking into account the heterogeneous follow up during RSV seasons. The corrected Figure 4 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.