Objective: To characterize individuals with stroke who responded or did not respond to upper limb motor treatment by analyzing muscle synergy patterns (similarity, merging, and fractionation). Design: This study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Setting: Inpatients of 2 specialized neurorehabilitation hospitals. Participants: We enrolled individuals (N=62) with a unilateral first-event ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and severe-to-mild upper limb motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score of 5-61, of 66). We excluded people with untreated seizure, severe cognitive, or verbal comprehension impairment. Interventions: After randomization, individuals were allocated to conventional, virtual reality, or robot-assisted treatment groups (20 sessions, 1 h/d, 5 d/wk, 4wk). Main outcome measures: A blinded assessor performed assessments both before and after the intervention. Surface electromyography recordings from 16 muscles during reaching tasks were collected pre- and post-treatment. We extracted muscle synergy patterns (similarity, merging, and fractionation) of the stroke-affected and unaffected upper limb of each subject. Results: Overall, individuals improved upper limb motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity change score=7.14±7.46; P<.001). We identified 34 responders to treatment showing clinically significant improvement (over the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of 5 points on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity). The responders showed decreased merging of synergies (P=.016) as compared with the non-responders (P=.025), who conversely showed improved similarity of synergies (P=.006). Conclusions: In individuals with stroke undergoing upper limb motor rehabilitation, changes in the synergy merging pattern may serve as a potential marker to distinguish responders from non-responders.
Pregnolato, G., Severini, G., Maistrello, L., Rimini, D., Lencioni, T., Carpinella, I., et al. (2025). Muscle Synergy Analysis for Clinical Characterization of Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 107(2), 261-269 [10.1016/j.apmr.2025.05.019].
Muscle Synergy Analysis for Clinical Characterization of Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke
Maistrello L.;Turolla A.Ultimo
2025
Abstract
Objective: To characterize individuals with stroke who responded or did not respond to upper limb motor treatment by analyzing muscle synergy patterns (similarity, merging, and fractionation). Design: This study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Setting: Inpatients of 2 specialized neurorehabilitation hospitals. Participants: We enrolled individuals (N=62) with a unilateral first-event ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and severe-to-mild upper limb motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score of 5-61, of 66). We excluded people with untreated seizure, severe cognitive, or verbal comprehension impairment. Interventions: After randomization, individuals were allocated to conventional, virtual reality, or robot-assisted treatment groups (20 sessions, 1 h/d, 5 d/wk, 4wk). Main outcome measures: A blinded assessor performed assessments both before and after the intervention. Surface electromyography recordings from 16 muscles during reaching tasks were collected pre- and post-treatment. We extracted muscle synergy patterns (similarity, merging, and fractionation) of the stroke-affected and unaffected upper limb of each subject. Results: Overall, individuals improved upper limb motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity change score=7.14±7.46; P<.001). We identified 34 responders to treatment showing clinically significant improvement (over the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of 5 points on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity). The responders showed decreased merging of synergies (P=.016) as compared with the non-responders (P=.025), who conversely showed improved similarity of synergies (P=.006). Conclusions: In individuals with stroke undergoing upper limb motor rehabilitation, changes in the synergy merging pattern may serve as a potential marker to distinguish responders from non-responders.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pregnolato_2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
887.8 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
887.8 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
file supplementari (3).zip
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
1.33 MB
Formato
Zip File
|
1.33 MB | Zip File | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


