Objective: To explore the experiences of patients with advanced cancer regarding the timing of ACP. Methods: This secondary analysis used data from the ACTION cluster-randomized clinical trial. 288 patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer, WHO performance status 0-3, and with a minimum life expectancy of 3 months were included in this analysis. Results: The mean time between patients' cancer diagnosis and the first ACP conversation was 15.3 months (SD:19.4). The average duration from current cancer stage diagnosis to the first conversation was 8.9 months (SD:10.7). The timing of the conversation was perceived as "just right" by 217 (75.3 %) of the patients. Patients who perceived the timing as "too early" were more recently diagnosed with cancer (9.1 months) or with their current cancer stage (5.7 months) than those who did not. Patients perceiving the timing as "too late" had shorter estimated survival times. Conclusion: Patients with advanced cancer may benefit from earlier ACP than what is currently typically initiated in clinical practice. Practice implications: When initiating ACP conversations, several aspects should be considered, including patients' gender, their socio-cultural environment, and their ability to perform daily activities, with or without limitations.

Zhu, T., Rietjens, J.A., Van Delden, J.J.M., Deliens, L., Van Der Heide, A., Johnsen, A.T., et al. (2025). Timing of advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: Analysis of ACTION data. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 136, 1-8 [10.1016/j.pec.2025.108761].

Timing of advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: Analysis of ACTION data

Ingravallo F.;
2025

Abstract

Objective: To explore the experiences of patients with advanced cancer regarding the timing of ACP. Methods: This secondary analysis used data from the ACTION cluster-randomized clinical trial. 288 patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer, WHO performance status 0-3, and with a minimum life expectancy of 3 months were included in this analysis. Results: The mean time between patients' cancer diagnosis and the first ACP conversation was 15.3 months (SD:19.4). The average duration from current cancer stage diagnosis to the first conversation was 8.9 months (SD:10.7). The timing of the conversation was perceived as "just right" by 217 (75.3 %) of the patients. Patients who perceived the timing as "too early" were more recently diagnosed with cancer (9.1 months) or with their current cancer stage (5.7 months) than those who did not. Patients perceiving the timing as "too late" had shorter estimated survival times. Conclusion: Patients with advanced cancer may benefit from earlier ACP than what is currently typically initiated in clinical practice. Practice implications: When initiating ACP conversations, several aspects should be considered, including patients' gender, their socio-cultural environment, and their ability to perform daily activities, with or without limitations.
2025
Zhu, T., Rietjens, J.A., Van Delden, J.J.M., Deliens, L., Van Der Heide, A., Johnsen, A.T., et al. (2025). Timing of advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: Analysis of ACTION data. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 136, 1-8 [10.1016/j.pec.2025.108761].
Zhu, T.; Rietjens, J. A.; Van Delden, J. J. M.; Deliens, L.; Van Der Heide, A.; Johnsen, A. T.; Ingravallo, F.; Lunder, U.; Preston, N. J.; Seymour, J...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Timing ACP.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 940.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
940.81 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1047588
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact