This article examines the rise and global influence of sericulture experimental stations from 1869 to 1900, framing them as an international ‘World-Wide Silk Web’. Focusing on the Padua sericulture station as a case study, the essay traces how these stations initially emerged in response to the pébrine epizootic that devastated silk production across Europe and Asia. It argues that the adoption and diffusion of Louis Pasteur’s preventive method against pébrine owed less to individual scientific discovery than to the collective work of these stations. Sericulture stations became hubs of techno-entomological knowledge, by blending traditional practices with new methods, creating knowledge commodities, and disseminating technical knowledge. Operating at the intersection of national interests and international collaboration, stations exchanged expertise, materials, knowledge and innovations while supporting local silk industries. The article highlights the asymmetrical yet polycentric nature of this network, shaped by economic partnerships, scientific authority, geopolitical aims, and international contexts—though distinct from imperial extraction models.
Di Gennaro, B. (In stampa/Attività in corso). World-Wide Silk Web: The Padua Sericulture Station and the International Circulation of Techno-Entomology (1869-1900). BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE, ?, ?-x.
World-Wide Silk Web: The Padua Sericulture Station and the International Circulation of Techno-Entomology (1869-1900)
Barbara Di Gennaro SplendorePrimo
In corso di stampa
Abstract
This article examines the rise and global influence of sericulture experimental stations from 1869 to 1900, framing them as an international ‘World-Wide Silk Web’. Focusing on the Padua sericulture station as a case study, the essay traces how these stations initially emerged in response to the pébrine epizootic that devastated silk production across Europe and Asia. It argues that the adoption and diffusion of Louis Pasteur’s preventive method against pébrine owed less to individual scientific discovery than to the collective work of these stations. Sericulture stations became hubs of techno-entomological knowledge, by blending traditional practices with new methods, creating knowledge commodities, and disseminating technical knowledge. Operating at the intersection of national interests and international collaboration, stations exchanged expertise, materials, knowledge and innovations while supporting local silk industries. The article highlights the asymmetrical yet polycentric nature of this network, shaped by economic partnerships, scientific authority, geopolitical aims, and international contexts—though distinct from imperial extraction models.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


