Causality is vital for establishing legal liability, but traditional analyses often fail to address complex scenarios and conflate causation with legal responsibility. This paper presents a novel approach to cause-in-fact based on argumentation theory which also assesses whether a cause-in-fact lacks legal relevance.
Liepina, R., Pisano, G., Sartor, G. (2024). Addressing Causal Puzzles in Law Through Argumentation. NIEUWE HEMWEG 6B, 1013 BG AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS : IOS Press BV [10.3233/faia241276].
Addressing Causal Puzzles in Law Through Argumentation
Liepina, Ruta;Pisano, Giuseppe;Sartor, Giovanni
2024
Abstract
Causality is vital for establishing legal liability, but traditional analyses often fail to address complex scenarios and conflate causation with legal responsibility. This paper presents a novel approach to cause-in-fact based on argumentation theory which also assesses whether a cause-in-fact lacks legal relevance.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
