Livestock farm biosecurity is crucial for animal health and economic sustainability, however uneven adoption/implementation across diverse livestock species and production systems persists. To improve uptake of biosecurity, it is necessary to identify critical economic behavioural, and systematic barriers, and to outline practical drivers. Perceived high costs, labour/time burdens, and uncertain benefits can suppress private investment, while poorly designed indemnities can create moral hazard. Conversely, targeted subsidies, risk-based insurance, and market standards (e.g., certification and procurement) can incentivise implementation. Knowledge and trust gaps, especially in smallholder and backyard settings, further limit compliance. Participatory, and context-specific training led by field veterinarians consistently outperforms top–down messaging, with effective element including: simple, low-cost “easy wins”, tiered checklists, and decision-support tools to help embed routines and demonstrate the value of biosecurity. Integrating clear cost–benefit evidence, incentive-based tools, and co-designed training can transform biosecurity from a perceived practical and cost burden into a resilient, profitable practice that delivers public-good benefits for animal health, trade, and One Health across Europe and beyond.

Mehmedi, B., Iatrou, A.M., Yildiz, R., Lamont, K., Da Costa, M.R., De Nardi, M., et al. (2025). Economic Perspectives on Farm Biosecurity: Stakeholder Challenges and Livestock Species Considerations. AGRICULTURE, 15(21), 1-21 [10.3390/agriculture15212288].

Economic Perspectives on Farm Biosecurity: Stakeholder Challenges and Livestock Species Considerations

De Nardi, Marco;
2025

Abstract

Livestock farm biosecurity is crucial for animal health and economic sustainability, however uneven adoption/implementation across diverse livestock species and production systems persists. To improve uptake of biosecurity, it is necessary to identify critical economic behavioural, and systematic barriers, and to outline practical drivers. Perceived high costs, labour/time burdens, and uncertain benefits can suppress private investment, while poorly designed indemnities can create moral hazard. Conversely, targeted subsidies, risk-based insurance, and market standards (e.g., certification and procurement) can incentivise implementation. Knowledge and trust gaps, especially in smallholder and backyard settings, further limit compliance. Participatory, and context-specific training led by field veterinarians consistently outperforms top–down messaging, with effective element including: simple, low-cost “easy wins”, tiered checklists, and decision-support tools to help embed routines and demonstrate the value of biosecurity. Integrating clear cost–benefit evidence, incentive-based tools, and co-designed training can transform biosecurity from a perceived practical and cost burden into a resilient, profitable practice that delivers public-good benefits for animal health, trade, and One Health across Europe and beyond.
2025
Mehmedi, B., Iatrou, A.M., Yildiz, R., Lamont, K., Da Costa, M.R., De Nardi, M., et al. (2025). Economic Perspectives on Farm Biosecurity: Stakeholder Challenges and Livestock Species Considerations. AGRICULTURE, 15(21), 1-21 [10.3390/agriculture15212288].
Mehmedi, Blerta; Iatrou, Anna Maria; Yildiz, Ramazan; Lamont, Kate; Da Costa, Maria Rodrigues; De Nardi, Marco; Allepuz, Alberto; Niine, Tarmo; Niemi,...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025_Cost Better_Economic Perspectives on Farm Biosecurity.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 793.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
793.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1044103
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact