CRIS Current Research Information System
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishAccurate knowledge of joint kinematics is fundamental for research and clinical purposes. Radiologic based joint kinematic estimation technique have been recently used to study intact joint in-vivo kinematics. Bi-planar methods are more accurate but expensive and invasive, while mono-planar ones are less reliable but more suitable for the clinical practice. The present work is a comparison of mono- and bi-planar fluoroscopic methods using the marker based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as gold-standard. Five repetitions of a simulated walking task with bone phantoms were analyzed. The dominant source of error for the bi-planar method was the longitudinal symmetry of the bones. The mono-planar technique was limited in the estimation of the out-of-plane pose parameters, but as good as bi-planar for the in-plane pose parameters. With error of the order of the millimeter and the degree, mono-planar fluoroscopy could be sufficient for clinical analysis, provided that it relies upon the most reliable information and avoiding the out-of-plane transaltion.
| Titolo: | QUANTIFICATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MONO- AND BI-PLANAR 3D FLUOROSCOPY COMPARED TO MARKER-BASED RSA |
| Autore/i: | TERSI, LUCA; Arnaud Barré; FANTOZZI, SILVIA; Kamiar Aminian; STAGNI, RITA |
| Autore/i Unibo: | |
| Anno: | 2011 |
| Titolo del libro: | Proceedings of ISB |
| Pagina iniziale: | 1 |
| Pagina finale: | 2 |
| Abstract: | Accurate knowledge of joint kinematics is fundamental for research and clinical purposes. Radiologic based joint kinematic estimation technique have been recently used to study intact joint in-vivo kinematics. Bi-planar methods are more accurate but expensive and invasive, while mono-planar ones are less reliable but more suitable for the clinical practice. The present work is a comparison of mono- and bi-planar fluoroscopic methods using the marker based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as gold-standard. Five repetitions of a simulated walking task with bone phantoms were analyzed. The dominant source of error for the bi-planar method was the longitudinal symmetry of the bones. The mono-planar technique was limited in the estimation of the out-of-plane pose parameters, but as good as bi-planar for the in-plane pose parameters. With error of the order of the millimeter and the degree, mono-planar fluoroscopy could be sufficient for clinical analysis, provided that it relies upon the most reliable information and avoiding the out-of-plane transaltion. |
| Data prodotto definitivo in UGOV: | 28-mag-2013 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 4.02 Riassunto (Abstract) |
File in questo prodotto:
Copyright © 2020