The difference in the diagnostic accuracy of 22- versus 25-gauge needles in EUS-FNA is not clear. Aims: To compare the rates of technical success, diagnostic accuracy and complications of EUS-FNA performed with 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles on the same solid pancreatic mass. Methods: All patients with solid pancreatic masses evaluated from September 2007 to December 2008 were enrolled and underwent EUS-FNA with both 22- and 25-gauge needles with randomisation of needle sequence. The accuracy of the EUS-FNA was determined by comparing the cytological results with the final surgical pathological diagnoses or with the results of a clinical follow-up. A cytological score with different qualitative parameters was created, and a comparison between these parameters was carried out for each needle. Results: Fifty patients with 50 pancreatic masses were recruited. Technical success was 100% and no complications occurred. Diagnostic accuracy was 94% and 86% for the 25- and 22-gauge needles, respectively. Analysis of the cytological score showed a tendency towards the 25-gauge needle, although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: EUS-FNA performed with 22- or 25-gauge needles had the same diagnostic accuracy. Our study results confirm a significant trend towards a better cytological diagnosis for the 25-gauge needle. © 2011 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.

Fabbri, C., Polifemo, A.M., Luigiano, C., Cennamo, V., Baccarini, P., Collina, G., et al. (2011). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: A prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 43(8), 647-652 [10.1016/j.dld.2011.04.005].

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: A prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence

Fabbri C.;Macchia S.;Zanini N.;Jovine E.;
2011

Abstract

The difference in the diagnostic accuracy of 22- versus 25-gauge needles in EUS-FNA is not clear. Aims: To compare the rates of technical success, diagnostic accuracy and complications of EUS-FNA performed with 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles on the same solid pancreatic mass. Methods: All patients with solid pancreatic masses evaluated from September 2007 to December 2008 were enrolled and underwent EUS-FNA with both 22- and 25-gauge needles with randomisation of needle sequence. The accuracy of the EUS-FNA was determined by comparing the cytological results with the final surgical pathological diagnoses or with the results of a clinical follow-up. A cytological score with different qualitative parameters was created, and a comparison between these parameters was carried out for each needle. Results: Fifty patients with 50 pancreatic masses were recruited. Technical success was 100% and no complications occurred. Diagnostic accuracy was 94% and 86% for the 25- and 22-gauge needles, respectively. Analysis of the cytological score showed a tendency towards the 25-gauge needle, although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: EUS-FNA performed with 22- or 25-gauge needles had the same diagnostic accuracy. Our study results confirm a significant trend towards a better cytological diagnosis for the 25-gauge needle. © 2011 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.
2011
Fabbri, C., Polifemo, A.M., Luigiano, C., Cennamo, V., Baccarini, P., Collina, G., et al. (2011). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: A prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 43(8), 647-652 [10.1016/j.dld.2011.04.005].
Fabbri, C.; Polifemo, A. M.; Luigiano, C.; Cennamo, V.; Baccarini, P.; Collina, G.; Fornelli, A.; Macchia, S.; Zanini, N.; Jovine, E.; Fiscaletti, M.;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1040494
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 85
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 75
social impact