Polyp retrieval following colorectal polypectomy remains a critical step for histopathological analysis and determining appropriate surveillance intervals. Despite reported retrieval rates exceeding 90% in the literature, significant heterogeneity persists in clinical practice, particularly for polyps < 10 mm, due to the lack of standardized retrieval methods. This review synthesizes current evidence on polyp retrieval techniques, the impact of lesion size, and device-specific considerations, including suction-based methods, retrieval nets, and other approaches such as the water-bolus and water-slider techniques. We also examine the clinical utility and limitations of the “resect and discard” and “diagnose and leave in situ” strategies, highlighting barriers to widespread implementation such as medico-legal risks, variability in optical diagnosis, and discrepancies across international guidelines. The integration of advanced imaging technologies, including high-definition endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, and artificial intelligence-driven computer-aided diagnosis (CADx), represent promising tools to help in increasing the diagnostic accuracy of diminutive polyps. As post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations remain tethered to histological findings, this review underlines the need for updated, evidence-based frameworks that take into account technological advancements while ensuring diagnostic precision, cost-effectiveness, and patient safety in colorectal cancer prevention.
Gibiino, G., Binda, C., Secco, M., Cosentino, L., Poggioli, F., Cappetta, S., et al. (2025). Resect and Retrieve Colorectal Polyps: Time for New Insights. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 14(16), 1-10 [10.3390/jcm14165846].
Resect and Retrieve Colorectal Polyps: Time for New Insights
Binda C.;Secco M.;Cappetta S.;Trama D.;Fabbri C.
2025
Abstract
Polyp retrieval following colorectal polypectomy remains a critical step for histopathological analysis and determining appropriate surveillance intervals. Despite reported retrieval rates exceeding 90% in the literature, significant heterogeneity persists in clinical practice, particularly for polyps < 10 mm, due to the lack of standardized retrieval methods. This review synthesizes current evidence on polyp retrieval techniques, the impact of lesion size, and device-specific considerations, including suction-based methods, retrieval nets, and other approaches such as the water-bolus and water-slider techniques. We also examine the clinical utility and limitations of the “resect and discard” and “diagnose and leave in situ” strategies, highlighting barriers to widespread implementation such as medico-legal risks, variability in optical diagnosis, and discrepancies across international guidelines. The integration of advanced imaging technologies, including high-definition endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, and artificial intelligence-driven computer-aided diagnosis (CADx), represent promising tools to help in increasing the diagnostic accuracy of diminutive polyps. As post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations remain tethered to histological findings, this review underlines the need for updated, evidence-based frameworks that take into account technological advancements while ensuring diagnostic precision, cost-effectiveness, and patient safety in colorectal cancer prevention.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
jcm-14-05846-v2.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
354.11 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
354.11 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


