Persistent societal biases like misogyny express themselves more often implicitly than through openly hostile language.However, previous misogyny studies have focused primarily on explicit language, overlooking these more subtle forms. We bridge this gap by examining implicit misogynistic expressions in English and Italian. First, we develop a taxonomy of social dynamics, i.e., the underlying communicative intent behind misogynistic statements in social media data. Then, we test the ability of nine LLMs to identify the social dynamics as a multi-label classification and text span selection: first LLMs must choose social dynamics given a prefixed list, then they have to explicitly identify the text spans that triggered their decisions. We also investigate the extent of using different learning settings: zero and few-shot, and prescriptive. Our analysis suggests that LLMs struggle to follow instructions and reason in all settings, mostly relying on semantic associations, recasting claims of emergent abilities.
Muti, A., Emmery, C., Nozza, D., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Caselli, T. (2025). The “r” in “woman” stands for rights. Auditing LLMs in Uncovering Social Dynamics in Implicit Misogyny. Association for Computational Linguistics [10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.292].
The “r” in “woman” stands for rights. Auditing LLMs in Uncovering Social Dynamics in Implicit Misogyny
Muti, Arianna
;Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto;Caselli, Tommaso
2025
Abstract
Persistent societal biases like misogyny express themselves more often implicitly than through openly hostile language.However, previous misogyny studies have focused primarily on explicit language, overlooking these more subtle forms. We bridge this gap by examining implicit misogynistic expressions in English and Italian. First, we develop a taxonomy of social dynamics, i.e., the underlying communicative intent behind misogynistic statements in social media data. Then, we test the ability of nine LLMs to identify the social dynamics as a multi-label classification and text span selection: first LLMs must choose social dynamics given a prefixed list, then they have to explicitly identify the text spans that triggered their decisions. We also investigate the extent of using different learning settings: zero and few-shot, and prescriptive. Our analysis suggests that LLMs struggle to follow instructions and reason in all settings, mostly relying on semantic associations, recasting claims of emergent abilities.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025.findings-emnlp.292.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
601.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
601.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



