This paper characterises Ethicametrics (EM) as a new interdisciplinary scientific research area focusing on metrics of ethics (MOE) and ethics of metrics (EOM), by providing a comprehensive methodological framework. EM is scientific: it is based on behavioural mathematical modelling to be statistically validated and tested, with additional sensitivity analyses to favour immediate interpretations. EM is interdisciplinary: it spans from less to more traditional fields, with essential mutual improvements. EM is new: valid and invalid examples of EM (articles referring to an explicit and an implicit behavioural model, respectively) are scarce, recent, time-stable and discipline-focused, with 1 and 37 scientists, respectively. Thus, the core of EM (multi-level statistical analyses applied to behavioural mathematical models) is crucial to avoid biased MOE and EOM. Conversely, articles inside EM should study quantitatively any metrics or ethics, in any alternative context, at any analytical level, by using panel/longitudinal data. Behavioural models should be ethically explicit, possibly by evaluating ethics in terms of the consequences of actions. Ethical measures should be scientifically grounded by evaluating metrics in terms of ethical criteria coming from the relevant theological/philosophical literature. Note that behavioural models applied to science metrics can be used to deduce social consequences to be ethically evaluated.
Zagonari, F. (2025). Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science. STATS, 8(3), 1-19 [10.3390/stats8030050].
Ethicametrics: A New Interdisciplinary Science
Zagonari F.
2025
Abstract
This paper characterises Ethicametrics (EM) as a new interdisciplinary scientific research area focusing on metrics of ethics (MOE) and ethics of metrics (EOM), by providing a comprehensive methodological framework. EM is scientific: it is based on behavioural mathematical modelling to be statistically validated and tested, with additional sensitivity analyses to favour immediate interpretations. EM is interdisciplinary: it spans from less to more traditional fields, with essential mutual improvements. EM is new: valid and invalid examples of EM (articles referring to an explicit and an implicit behavioural model, respectively) are scarce, recent, time-stable and discipline-focused, with 1 and 37 scientists, respectively. Thus, the core of EM (multi-level statistical analyses applied to behavioural mathematical models) is crucial to avoid biased MOE and EOM. Conversely, articles inside EM should study quantitatively any metrics or ethics, in any alternative context, at any analytical level, by using panel/longitudinal data. Behavioural models should be ethically explicit, possibly by evaluating ethics in terms of the consequences of actions. Ethical measures should be scientifically grounded by evaluating metrics in terms of ethical criteria coming from the relevant theological/philosophical literature. Note that behavioural models applied to science metrics can be used to deduce social consequences to be ethically evaluated.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
stats-08-00050.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
920.38 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
920.38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


