Purpose: This article aims to review techniques and applications for using double flaps (both free and pedicled, and their combinations) in reconstructing defects from total pharyngolaryngectomies (TPL) or pharyngolaryngo-esophagectomies. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Three authors screened articles, selecting and extracting data on malignancy characteristics, reconstructive techniques, outcomes and complications. Results: Eleven articles were reviewed, involving 176 oncologic patients. Most patients (39.8%) had defects in the larynx, hypopharynx and cervical skin, while in 31.8% the double flaps were used to restore the pharynx and protect the visceral anastomosis. In most studies included, preoperative treatments were administered, including radiotherapy (RT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and surgery, either alone or in combination. A wide variety of pedicled and free flaps were described. The most common pedicled flap is the pectoralis flap (81 patients, 46%), while the most used free flap is the jejunum flap (124 patients, 70%). 19 patients (10.8%) manifested partial necrosis or encountered minor complications postoperatively. 5 patients necessitated a surgical revision of the flap. Conclusion: The literature on surgical reconstructions following TPL or pharyngolaryngo-esophagectomies using double flaps is limited. The use of double flap is indicated in cases of TPL with extensive skin defect but is also recommended in case of salvage TPL without skin defect.

Sacchetto, A., Meneghesso, S., Mazzola, M., Sacchetto, L., Molteni, G., Dallari, V. (2025). Use of double flaps in pharyngo-laryngo-esophageal reconstructions: a retrospective review. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 282(11), 5485-5496 [10.1007/s00405-025-09456-z].

Use of double flaps in pharyngo-laryngo-esophageal reconstructions: a retrospective review

Molteni G.;Dallari V.
2025

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to review techniques and applications for using double flaps (both free and pedicled, and their combinations) in reconstructing defects from total pharyngolaryngectomies (TPL) or pharyngolaryngo-esophagectomies. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Three authors screened articles, selecting and extracting data on malignancy characteristics, reconstructive techniques, outcomes and complications. Results: Eleven articles were reviewed, involving 176 oncologic patients. Most patients (39.8%) had defects in the larynx, hypopharynx and cervical skin, while in 31.8% the double flaps were used to restore the pharynx and protect the visceral anastomosis. In most studies included, preoperative treatments were administered, including radiotherapy (RT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and surgery, either alone or in combination. A wide variety of pedicled and free flaps were described. The most common pedicled flap is the pectoralis flap (81 patients, 46%), while the most used free flap is the jejunum flap (124 patients, 70%). 19 patients (10.8%) manifested partial necrosis or encountered minor complications postoperatively. 5 patients necessitated a surgical revision of the flap. Conclusion: The literature on surgical reconstructions following TPL or pharyngolaryngo-esophagectomies using double flaps is limited. The use of double flap is indicated in cases of TPL with extensive skin defect but is also recommended in case of salvage TPL without skin defect.
2025
Sacchetto, A., Meneghesso, S., Mazzola, M., Sacchetto, L., Molteni, G., Dallari, V. (2025). Use of double flaps in pharyngo-laryngo-esophageal reconstructions: a retrospective review. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 282(11), 5485-5496 [10.1007/s00405-025-09456-z].
Sacchetto, A.; Meneghesso, S.; Mazzola, M.; Sacchetto, L.; Molteni, G.; Dallari, V.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1029874
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact