According to traditional historical interpretation, Carthage initiated an ambitious project of Mediterranean expansion around the middle of the 6th century BC, which culminated simultaneously in the creation of a vast territorial empire and the formation of the Punic world. This monolithic interpretation had long been dogmatically accepted in studies, but has since been abandoned by Spanish historiography and become a topic of debate also regarding the central Mediterranean. The aim of the present paper is critically review certain entrenched assumptions in the literature and to present an alternative model that reconciles old data with new revelations. It envisages the existence of different forms of Carthaginian hegemony that manifested together or independently since the second half of the 8th century BC in individual geographical regions and according to contingent historical circumstances. This entails a radical change of perspective compared to the dominant paradigm, in which the economic, cultural, and political-military irradiation of the North African city appears inseparable from and, in principle, concurrent with the outcome of an armed conquest.
Secondo la ricostruzione storica tradizionale, Cartagine avrebbe avviato intorno alla metà del VI secolo a.C. un ambizioso progetto di espansione mediterranea, poi culminato con la creazione di un vasto impero territoriale e la contestuale formazione del mondo punico. Tale visione monolitica, a lungo dogmaticamente accolta negli studi, è stata da tempo abbandonata dalla storiografia spagnola ed è oggi argomento di discussione anche per quanto concerne il Mediterraneo centrale. In questo contributo si intende proporre una revisione critica di alcuni assunti più radicati in letteratura e presentare un modello alternativo, che permetta di conciliare i vecchi dati con le nuove acquisizioni. Esso prevede l’esistenza di diverse forme di egemonia cartaginese, manifestatesi – fin dalla seconda metà dell’VIII secolo a.C. – insieme o indipendentemente l’una dall’altra, nelle singole regioni geografiche e secondo le circostanze storiche contingenti. Ciò comporta un radicale cambiamento di prospettiva rispetto al paradigma dominante, nel quale l’irradiazione economica, culturale e politico-militare della città nordafricana appaiono di fatto inscindibili e si verificano, in linea di massima, tutte nello stesso momento come esito di una conquista armata.
Secci, R. (2024). Carthaginian expansion in the Central-Western Mediterranean (8th-3rd Century BC): Deconstructing and reconstructing paradigms. BYRSA, 45-46, 211-249.
Carthaginian expansion in the Central-Western Mediterranean (8th-3rd Century BC): Deconstructing and reconstructing paradigms
R. Secci
2024
Abstract
According to traditional historical interpretation, Carthage initiated an ambitious project of Mediterranean expansion around the middle of the 6th century BC, which culminated simultaneously in the creation of a vast territorial empire and the formation of the Punic world. This monolithic interpretation had long been dogmatically accepted in studies, but has since been abandoned by Spanish historiography and become a topic of debate also regarding the central Mediterranean. The aim of the present paper is critically review certain entrenched assumptions in the literature and to present an alternative model that reconciles old data with new revelations. It envisages the existence of different forms of Carthaginian hegemony that manifested together or independently since the second half of the 8th century BC in individual geographical regions and according to contingent historical circumstances. This entails a radical change of perspective compared to the dominant paradigm, in which the economic, cultural, and political-military irradiation of the North African city appears inseparable from and, in principle, concurrent with the outcome of an armed conquest.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


