Legal conflicts between statutes or constitutional articles present a significant challenge in maintaining consistency and coherence within legal systems. Addressing these conflicts requires extensive human expertise, making the process labor-intensive and time-consuming. In this paper, we introduce Clash-of-Leges, a novel multilingual dataset derived from rulings by the Constitutional Court of the Italian Republic, designed to aid the automation of conflict detection and explanation between legal articles. We identify three key tasks: Conflict Classification, which determines whether two legal articles are in conflict; Conflict Explanation Generation, which provides detailed explanations for identified conflicts; and Reference Retrieval, which sources relevant legal bases and precedents to substantiate interpretations. These tasks are intended to facilitate the development of AI models that can automatically identify and explain contradictions between legal provisions.
Italiani, P., Moro, G., Ragazzi, L. (2026). Clash-of-Leges: A Bilingual Dataset for Conflict Detection and Explanation in Statutory Law. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 300, 1-13 [10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130182].
Clash-of-Leges: A Bilingual Dataset for Conflict Detection and Explanation in Statutory Law
Paolo ItalianiCo-primo
;Gianluca Moro
Co-primo
;Luca Ragazzi
Co-primo
2026
Abstract
Legal conflicts between statutes or constitutional articles present a significant challenge in maintaining consistency and coherence within legal systems. Addressing these conflicts requires extensive human expertise, making the process labor-intensive and time-consuming. In this paper, we introduce Clash-of-Leges, a novel multilingual dataset derived from rulings by the Constitutional Court of the Italian Republic, designed to aid the automation of conflict detection and explanation between legal articles. We identify three key tasks: Conflict Classification, which determines whether two legal articles are in conflict; Conflict Explanation Generation, which provides detailed explanations for identified conflicts; and Reference Retrieval, which sources relevant legal bases and precedents to substantiate interpretations. These tasks are intended to facilitate the development of AI models that can automatically identify and explain contradictions between legal provisions.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S0957417425037972-main (1).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
2.94 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.94 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
1-s2.0-S0957417425037972-mmc1.zip
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
2.41 kB
Formato
Zip File
|
2.41 kB | Zip File | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


