Introduction: Nowadays, robotic surgery finds application in the field of head and neck in the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. The aim of this work is to examine the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in performing safe oncological resections of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with particular attention to the status of margins. Evidence acquisition: Literature search of English-language studies focused on TORS through PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 431 papers returned to search, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. Evidence synthesis: Within the selected studies, the overall rate of OPSCC positive margins following TORS is minimal, especially when patient selection is adequate and when TORS is used by high volume centers. Conclusions: TORS is a very precise and viable therapeutic tool that provides good results in terms of surgical radicality with low positive margin rates and good results in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival; however, there is still a great heterogeneity in margins definition within the available literature. Consequently, even if this surgical approach is very promising, it is still challenging to draw firm conclusions nowadays.

Albi, C., Ciorba, A., Bianchini, C., Cammaroto, G., Pelucchi, S., Sgarzani, R., et al. (2024). Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status. MINERVA SURGERY, 79(3), 346-353 [10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10235-3].

Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status

Rossella Sgarzani
Methodology
;
Manlio Gessaroli;Claudio Vicini;
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, robotic surgery finds application in the field of head and neck in the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. The aim of this work is to examine the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in performing safe oncological resections of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with particular attention to the status of margins. Evidence acquisition: Literature search of English-language studies focused on TORS through PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 431 papers returned to search, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. Evidence synthesis: Within the selected studies, the overall rate of OPSCC positive margins following TORS is minimal, especially when patient selection is adequate and when TORS is used by high volume centers. Conclusions: TORS is a very precise and viable therapeutic tool that provides good results in terms of surgical radicality with low positive margin rates and good results in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival; however, there is still a great heterogeneity in margins definition within the available literature. Consequently, even if this surgical approach is very promising, it is still challenging to draw firm conclusions nowadays.
2024
Albi, C., Ciorba, A., Bianchini, C., Cammaroto, G., Pelucchi, S., Sgarzani, R., et al. (2024). Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status. MINERVA SURGERY, 79(3), 346-353 [10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10235-3].
Albi, Cecilia; Ciorba, Andrea; Bianchini, Chiara; Cammaroto, Giovanni; Pelucchi, Stefano; Sgarzani, Rossella; Gessaroli, Manlio; De Vito, Andrea; Vici...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1019207
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact