Digital environments, particularly touchscreen media, increasingly characterize children’s everyday experiences, with children under three accessing apps, videos, and interactive content, especially in family settings. This creates an ‘educational paradox’: parents alarmed by ‘moral panic’ about digital media oppose tablets in educational contexts while using them in daily life with little critical-creative thinking – essentially as ‘shut-up toys.’ Moreover, connectivity in Italy has developed unevenly with significant regional differences, revealing a complex landscape of access and literacy inequalities across the country, particularly highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This article examines how early childhood educational services play a central role in developing digital culture for children as a literacy right, through their capacity to mediate and familiarize children with complex and creative uses of technological tools in dialogue with other play, reading, and learning materials, and to guide families navigating contradictory approaches, from prohibitionism to uncritical acceptance. Based on research, including the “Tabletti@mo in 0-6” project, we propose guidelines for selecting appropriate apps and promoting positive touchscreen interactions to support educational mediation that centers children’s rights and expressive capacities. We move beyond binary positions to recognize that traditional and digital tools need not be antagonistic.

Nardone, R. (2025). Digital media in 0-6: educational design between services and families = Media digitali tra 0 e 6 anni: progettazione educativa tra servizi e famiglie. MEDIA EDUCATION, 16(1), 25-33 [10.36253/me-17097].

Digital media in 0-6: educational design between services and families = Media digitali tra 0 e 6 anni: progettazione educativa tra servizi e famiglie

Nardone R.
2025

Abstract

Digital environments, particularly touchscreen media, increasingly characterize children’s everyday experiences, with children under three accessing apps, videos, and interactive content, especially in family settings. This creates an ‘educational paradox’: parents alarmed by ‘moral panic’ about digital media oppose tablets in educational contexts while using them in daily life with little critical-creative thinking – essentially as ‘shut-up toys.’ Moreover, connectivity in Italy has developed unevenly with significant regional differences, revealing a complex landscape of access and literacy inequalities across the country, particularly highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This article examines how early childhood educational services play a central role in developing digital culture for children as a literacy right, through their capacity to mediate and familiarize children with complex and creative uses of technological tools in dialogue with other play, reading, and learning materials, and to guide families navigating contradictory approaches, from prohibitionism to uncritical acceptance. Based on research, including the “Tabletti@mo in 0-6” project, we propose guidelines for selecting appropriate apps and promoting positive touchscreen interactions to support educational mediation that centers children’s rights and expressive capacities. We move beyond binary positions to recognize that traditional and digital tools need not be antagonistic.
2025
Nardone, R. (2025). Digital media in 0-6: educational design between services and families = Media digitali tra 0 e 6 anni: progettazione educativa tra servizi e famiglie. MEDIA EDUCATION, 16(1), 25-33 [10.36253/me-17097].
Nardone, R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
W00068_25-33_03-17097-Nardone.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 270.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
270.81 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1018490
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact