The degree of overlap between the mechanisms underlying attention control and motor planningremains debated. In this study, we examined whether microsaccades—tiny gaze shifts occurringduring fixation—are modulated differently by covert attention and motor intention. Eye movementswere recorded using high-precision eye-tracking. Our results reveal that whereas in a covertattention task, microsaccade direction was biased toward the attended location, in a motor planningtask, microsaccades were not directionally biased toward the cued location. Further, the rate ofmicrosaccades over time varied between the two tasks and whereas in the attention task a clearcorrelation emerged between microsaccade rate and visual detection reaction times across subjects,there was no relationship between microsaccade rate and reach/saccade reaction times. This studyadvances our understanding of the relationship between attention and motor processes, suggestingthat the mechanisms governing microsaccade generation are differentially influenced by motorplanning versus spatial covert attention engagement.
Brandolani, R., Galletti, C., Fattori, P., Breveglieri, R., Poletti, M. (2025). Distinct modulation of microsaccades in motor planning and covert attention. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 15(1), 1-12 [10.1038/s41598-025-03000-z].
Distinct modulation of microsaccades in motor planning and covert attention
Riccardo BrandolaniPrimo
Investigation
;Claudio GallettiSecondo
;Patrizia FattoriPenultimo
;Rossella Breveglieri
Co-ultimo
;
2025
Abstract
The degree of overlap between the mechanisms underlying attention control and motor planningremains debated. In this study, we examined whether microsaccades—tiny gaze shifts occurringduring fixation—are modulated differently by covert attention and motor intention. Eye movementswere recorded using high-precision eye-tracking. Our results reveal that whereas in a covertattention task, microsaccade direction was biased toward the attended location, in a motor planningtask, microsaccades were not directionally biased toward the cued location. Further, the rate ofmicrosaccades over time varied between the two tasks and whereas in the attention task a clearcorrelation emerged between microsaccade rate and visual detection reaction times across subjects,there was no relationship between microsaccade rate and reach/saccade reaction times. This studyadvances our understanding of the relationship between attention and motor processes, suggestingthat the mechanisms governing microsaccade generation are differentially influenced by motorplanning versus spatial covert attention engagement.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Brandolani_et_al-2025-Scientific_Reports.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
2.74 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.74 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
41598_2025_3000_MOESM1_ESM.docx
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
533.18 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
533.18 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


