The Commission brought an infringement action against Poland concerning the infamous judgments of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in cases P7/20 and K3/21 of 2021. Based on the Opinion by AG, the contribution argues that in its future ruling the ECJ should clarify the concept of constitutional identity and take a firm stance vis à vis the rejection of the principle of primacy by domestin constitutional courts.
Di Federico, G. (2025). In the Name of Primacy. Opinion C-448/23 and the EU’s Existential Principle of Primacy. VERFASSUNGSBLOG, 22 Aprile 2025, 1-5 [10.59704/27eb47c0c3937101].
In the Name of Primacy. Opinion C-448/23 and the EU’s Existential Principle of Primacy
Giacomo Di Federico
2025
Abstract
The Commission brought an infringement action against Poland concerning the infamous judgments of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in cases P7/20 and K3/21 of 2021. Based on the Opinion by AG, the contribution argues that in its future ruling the ECJ should clarify the concept of constitutional identity and take a firm stance vis à vis the rejection of the principle of primacy by domestin constitutional courts.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
verfassungsblog.de-Opinion C-44823 and the EUs Existential Principle of Primacy.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Condividi allo stesso modo (CCBYSA)
Dimensione
462.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
462.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
