This article examines the works of Alexander Radishchev and Namık Kemal to explore how Russian and Ottoman Enlightenments conceptualized emotion as integral to political subjectivity. Moving beyond conventional interpretations of these traditions as reactionary or subordinate to Western Enlightenment ideals, the study argues that both thinkers redefined emotion as the foundation of autonomy and collective identity, challenging binaries between rationalism and sentimentality. Radishchev’s Journey from Petersburg to Moscow demonstrates how emotional introspection enables the critique of social and political systems, transforming individual awareness into communal ethical engagement. Similarly, Kemal’s writings merge Romantic individualism with Enlightenment rationality, advocating for emotional conscience as a basis for modernization and cultural reform in the Ottoman Empire. This comparative study situates Radishchev and Kemal within the broader nineteenth-century intellectual field, where tensions between reason and emotion, individuality and collectivism and internal versus external authority shaped debates about modernity. It ultimately reveals the transnational complexity of Enlightenment thought and its enduring relevance for understanding the intersections of emotional and rational paradigms in shaping modern political and cultural discourses.
Seckin Dolcerocca, O.N., Flaherty, J. (2025). The Cry of the Heart: Russian and Ottoman Literary Enlightenments. COMPARATIVE CRITICAL STUDIES, 22(1), 7-30 [10.3366/ccs.2025.0545].
The Cry of the Heart: Russian and Ottoman Literary Enlightenments
Seckin Dolcerocca, Ozen Nergis
;Flaherty, Jennifer
2025
Abstract
This article examines the works of Alexander Radishchev and Namık Kemal to explore how Russian and Ottoman Enlightenments conceptualized emotion as integral to political subjectivity. Moving beyond conventional interpretations of these traditions as reactionary or subordinate to Western Enlightenment ideals, the study argues that both thinkers redefined emotion as the foundation of autonomy and collective identity, challenging binaries between rationalism and sentimentality. Radishchev’s Journey from Petersburg to Moscow demonstrates how emotional introspection enables the critique of social and political systems, transforming individual awareness into communal ethical engagement. Similarly, Kemal’s writings merge Romantic individualism with Enlightenment rationality, advocating for emotional conscience as a basis for modernization and cultural reform in the Ottoman Empire. This comparative study situates Radishchev and Kemal within the broader nineteenth-century intellectual field, where tensions between reason and emotion, individuality and collectivism and internal versus external authority shaped debates about modernity. It ultimately reveals the transnational complexity of Enlightenment thought and its enduring relevance for understanding the intersections of emotional and rational paradigms in shaping modern political and cultural discourses.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CCS 22.1 DOLCEROCCA FLAHERTY_FINAL_POST.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
487.35 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
487.35 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


