Those of us who live and work in the “West” have spent careers writing about life, death, resistance, love and pain, addressing desensitised audiences who have learned to see Palestinians as violent, backward, and less than human. Settler colonial power has long proceeded by dehumanising and absenting the colonised from its gaze. But while such multifaceted epistemic violence against Palestinians was once primarily the modality of Israel, today qualitatively novel structures of dehumanisation are being deployed, effecting a wider, deeper, and more systematic inversion of reality through innocuoussounding rubrics such as “impartiality,” “scientific standards” and “ethics.” These perceptual prisms are increasingly applied across contexts including universities, government representatives, media outlets and certain strands of anthropological writing. There is an urgent need to name and challenge what paradoxically amounts to techniques of reality reversal and to understand not just their geopolitical aims but also the epistemic and affective structures that underpin them.
Salih, R. (2025). On Reversing Reality. The Cunning of Impartiality on Gaza. PUBLIC ANTHROPOLOGIST, 7(2), 244-261 [10.1163/25891715-bja10075].
On Reversing Reality. The Cunning of Impartiality on Gaza.
Ruba Salih
Primo
2025
Abstract
Those of us who live and work in the “West” have spent careers writing about life, death, resistance, love and pain, addressing desensitised audiences who have learned to see Palestinians as violent, backward, and less than human. Settler colonial power has long proceeded by dehumanising and absenting the colonised from its gaze. But while such multifaceted epistemic violence against Palestinians was once primarily the modality of Israel, today qualitatively novel structures of dehumanisation are being deployed, effecting a wider, deeper, and more systematic inversion of reality through innocuoussounding rubrics such as “impartiality,” “scientific standards” and “ethics.” These perceptual prisms are increasingly applied across contexts including universities, government representatives, media outlets and certain strands of anthropological writing. There is an urgent need to name and challenge what paradoxically amounts to techniques of reality reversal and to understand not just their geopolitical aims but also the epistemic and affective structures that underpin them.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
puan-article-p244_006.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Altra tipologia di licenza compatibile con Open Access
Dimensione
417.22 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
417.22 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


