Purpose Personalized musculoskeletal models are crucial to get insights into the mechanisms underpinning neuromusculo- skeletal disorders and have the potential to support clinicians in the daily management and evaluation of patients. However, their use is still limited due to the lack of validation studies, which hinders people’s trust in these technologies. The current study aims to assess the predictive accuracy of two common approaches to estimate knee joint contact forces, when employ- ing musculoskeletal models. Methods Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were developed for four elderly subjects, exploiting the freely accessible Knee Grand Challenge datasets, and used to perform biomechanical simulations of level walking to estimate knee joint contact forces. The classical static optimization and EMG-assisted approaches were implemented to resolve the muscle redundancy problem. Their estimates were compared, in terms of predictive accuracy, against the experimental recordings from an instrumented knee implant and against one another. Spatiotemporal differences were identified through Statistical Parametrical Mapping, to complement traditional similarity metrics (R2 , RMSE, 95th percentile, and the maximal error). Results Both methods allowed to estimate the experimental knee joint contact forces experienced during walking with a high level of accuracy (R2 > 0.82, RMSE < 0.56 BW). The EMG-assisted approach further enabled to highlight subject-specific features that were not captured otherwise, such as a prolonged or anticipated muscle-co-contraction. Conclusion While the static optimization approach provides reasonable estimates for subjects exhibiting typical gait, the EMG-assisted approach should be preferred and employed when studying clinical populations or patients exhibiting abnor- mal walking patterns. Personalized musculoskeletal models are crucial to get insights into the mechanisms underpinning neuromusculoskeletal disorders and have the potential to support clinicians in the daily management and evaluation of patients. However, their use is still limited due to the lack of validation studies, which hinders people’s trust in these technologies. The current study aims to assess the predictive accuracy of two common approaches to estimate knee joint contact forces, when employing musculoskeletal models. Methods Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were developed for four elderly subjects, exploiting the freely accessible Knee Grand Challenge datasets, and used to perform biomechanical simulations of level walking to estimate knee joint contact forces. The classical static optimization and EMG-assisted approaches were implemented to resolve the muscle redundancy problem. Their estimates were compared, in terms of predictive accuracy, against the experimental recordings from an instrumented knee implant and against one another. Spatiotemporal differences were identified through Statistical Parametrical Mapping, to complement traditional similarity metrics (R2, RMSE, 95th percentile, and the maximal error). Results Both methods allowed to estimate the experimental knee joint contact forces experienced during walking with a high level of accuracy (R2 > 0.82, RMSE < 0.56 BW). The EMG-assisted approach further enabled to highlight subject-specific features that were not captured otherwise, such as a prolonged or anticipated muscle-co-contraction. Conclusion While the static optimization approach provides reasonable estimates for subjects exhibiting typical gait, the EMG-assisted approach should be preferred and employed when studying clinical populations or patients exhibiting abnormal walking patterns.
Princelle, D., Viceconti, M., Davico, G. (2025). EMG-Informed Neuromusculoskeletal Simulations Increase the Accuracy of the Estimation of Knee Joint Contact Forces During Sub-optimal Level Walking. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 53(6), 1399-1408 [10.1007/s10439-025-03713-2].
EMG-Informed Neuromusculoskeletal Simulations Increase the Accuracy of the Estimation of Knee Joint Contact Forces During Sub-optimal Level Walking
Viceconti, Marco;Davico, Giorgio
Ultimo
2025
Abstract
Purpose Personalized musculoskeletal models are crucial to get insights into the mechanisms underpinning neuromusculo- skeletal disorders and have the potential to support clinicians in the daily management and evaluation of patients. However, their use is still limited due to the lack of validation studies, which hinders people’s trust in these technologies. The current study aims to assess the predictive accuracy of two common approaches to estimate knee joint contact forces, when employ- ing musculoskeletal models. Methods Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were developed for four elderly subjects, exploiting the freely accessible Knee Grand Challenge datasets, and used to perform biomechanical simulations of level walking to estimate knee joint contact forces. The classical static optimization and EMG-assisted approaches were implemented to resolve the muscle redundancy problem. Their estimates were compared, in terms of predictive accuracy, against the experimental recordings from an instrumented knee implant and against one another. Spatiotemporal differences were identified through Statistical Parametrical Mapping, to complement traditional similarity metrics (R2 , RMSE, 95th percentile, and the maximal error). Results Both methods allowed to estimate the experimental knee joint contact forces experienced during walking with a high level of accuracy (R2 > 0.82, RMSE < 0.56 BW). The EMG-assisted approach further enabled to highlight subject-specific features that were not captured otherwise, such as a prolonged or anticipated muscle-co-contraction. Conclusion While the static optimization approach provides reasonable estimates for subjects exhibiting typical gait, the EMG-assisted approach should be preferred and employed when studying clinical populations or patients exhibiting abnor- mal walking patterns. Personalized musculoskeletal models are crucial to get insights into the mechanisms underpinning neuromusculoskeletal disorders and have the potential to support clinicians in the daily management and evaluation of patients. However, their use is still limited due to the lack of validation studies, which hinders people’s trust in these technologies. The current study aims to assess the predictive accuracy of two common approaches to estimate knee joint contact forces, when employing musculoskeletal models. Methods Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were developed for four elderly subjects, exploiting the freely accessible Knee Grand Challenge datasets, and used to perform biomechanical simulations of level walking to estimate knee joint contact forces. The classical static optimization and EMG-assisted approaches were implemented to resolve the muscle redundancy problem. Their estimates were compared, in terms of predictive accuracy, against the experimental recordings from an instrumented knee implant and against one another. Spatiotemporal differences were identified through Statistical Parametrical Mapping, to complement traditional similarity metrics (R2, RMSE, 95th percentile, and the maximal error). Results Both methods allowed to estimate the experimental knee joint contact forces experienced during walking with a high level of accuracy (R2 > 0.82, RMSE < 0.56 BW). The EMG-assisted approach further enabled to highlight subject-specific features that were not captured otherwise, such as a prolonged or anticipated muscle-co-contraction. Conclusion While the static optimization approach provides reasonable estimates for subjects exhibiting typical gait, the EMG-assisted approach should be preferred and employed when studying clinical populations or patients exhibiting abnormal walking patterns.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
s10439-025-03713-2.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
1.1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
10439_2025_3713_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
490.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
490.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


