Objectives Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for the resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions, providing high rates of 'en bloc' and R0 resection. East-West differences in ESD quality indicators have been reported. This study aims to assess feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of ESD for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal (GI) lesions in a Western cohort. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing ESD at one Italian endoscopic referral center from September 2018 to March 2020 were included in this prospective study. Primary outcomes were technical success, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, and adverse events (AEs). Results In total 111 patients (111 lesions) undergoing ESD were included. Anatomic site of the lesions was rectum in 56.8%, colon in 13.5%, stomach in 24.3%, and esophagus in 5.4% of cases, respectively. For upper GI procedures, technical success was 100%, and R0 and curative resection rates were 84.8% and 78.8%, respectively. For colorectal procedures, technical success was 98.7%, R0 and curative resection rates were 88.5% and 84.6%, respectively. Major AEs were reported in 12 cases (10.8%). Conclusion The introduction of ESD in a Tertiary Center is feasible, effective, and safe, and should be taken into consideration for the treatment of superficial GI lesions requiring 'en bloc' resection.

Sferrazza, S., Maida, M., Calabrese, G., Fiorentino, A., Vieceli, F., Facciorusso, A., et al. (2024). Effectiveness and safety of newly introduced endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western center: a real-life study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 36(11), 1281-1287 [10.1097/MEG.0000000000002829].

Effectiveness and safety of newly introduced endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western center: a real-life study

Fuccio, Lorenzo;
2024

Abstract

Objectives Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for the resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions, providing high rates of 'en bloc' and R0 resection. East-West differences in ESD quality indicators have been reported. This study aims to assess feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of ESD for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal (GI) lesions in a Western cohort. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing ESD at one Italian endoscopic referral center from September 2018 to March 2020 were included in this prospective study. Primary outcomes were technical success, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, and adverse events (AEs). Results In total 111 patients (111 lesions) undergoing ESD were included. Anatomic site of the lesions was rectum in 56.8%, colon in 13.5%, stomach in 24.3%, and esophagus in 5.4% of cases, respectively. For upper GI procedures, technical success was 100%, and R0 and curative resection rates were 84.8% and 78.8%, respectively. For colorectal procedures, technical success was 98.7%, R0 and curative resection rates were 88.5% and 84.6%, respectively. Major AEs were reported in 12 cases (10.8%). Conclusion The introduction of ESD in a Tertiary Center is feasible, effective, and safe, and should be taken into consideration for the treatment of superficial GI lesions requiring 'en bloc' resection.
2024
Sferrazza, S., Maida, M., Calabrese, G., Fiorentino, A., Vieceli, F., Facciorusso, A., et al. (2024). Effectiveness and safety of newly introduced endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western center: a real-life study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 36(11), 1281-1287 [10.1097/MEG.0000000000002829].
Sferrazza, Sandro; Maida, Marcello; Calabrese, Giulio; Fiorentino, Andrea; Vieceli, Filippo; Facciorusso, Antonio; Fuccio, Lorenzo; Maselli, Roberta; ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1009635
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact