aBstRact This real-world prospective observational study across 21 Italian centers (CART-SIE) compares axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) outcomes in 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma with baseline characteristics matched by stabilized inverse propensity score weighting. Axi-cel versus tisa-cel had higher all-grade cytokine release syndrome (78.6% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.0017) and neurotoxicity (9.9% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.0001) but also superior progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year (46.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.0009). Even among patients who failed bridging therapy, axi-cel PFS was superior to tisa-cel (37.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.0059). Differences in overall survival and high-grade immune toxicities were not significant. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score not only predicted hematologic toxicity but also 1-year survival outcomes (51.5% in CAR-HEMATOTOX high vs. 77.2% in CAR-HEMATOTOX low, P < 0.0001). Twenty patients developed second primary malignancies, including two cases of T-cell neoplasms. These findings enable more informed selection of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, balancing bridging, safety, and efficacy considerations for individual patients.

Stella, F., Chiappella, A., Casadei, B., Bramanti, S., Ljevar, S., Chiusolo, P., et al. (2024). A Multicenter Real-life Prospective Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel Toxicity and Outcomes in Large B-cell Lymphomas. BLOOD CANCER DISCOVERY, 5(5), 318-330 [10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-24-0052].

A Multicenter Real-life Prospective Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel Toxicity and Outcomes in Large B-cell Lymphomas

Casadei, Beatrice;Bonifazi, Francesca;Zinzani, Pier L.;
2024

Abstract

aBstRact This real-world prospective observational study across 21 Italian centers (CART-SIE) compares axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) outcomes in 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma with baseline characteristics matched by stabilized inverse propensity score weighting. Axi-cel versus tisa-cel had higher all-grade cytokine release syndrome (78.6% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.0017) and neurotoxicity (9.9% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.0001) but also superior progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year (46.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.0009). Even among patients who failed bridging therapy, axi-cel PFS was superior to tisa-cel (37.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.0059). Differences in overall survival and high-grade immune toxicities were not significant. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score not only predicted hematologic toxicity but also 1-year survival outcomes (51.5% in CAR-HEMATOTOX high vs. 77.2% in CAR-HEMATOTOX low, P < 0.0001). Twenty patients developed second primary malignancies, including two cases of T-cell neoplasms. These findings enable more informed selection of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, balancing bridging, safety, and efficacy considerations for individual patients.
2024
Stella, F., Chiappella, A., Casadei, B., Bramanti, S., Ljevar, S., Chiusolo, P., et al. (2024). A Multicenter Real-life Prospective Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel Toxicity and Outcomes in Large B-cell Lymphomas. BLOOD CANCER DISCOVERY, 5(5), 318-330 [10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-24-0052].
Stella, Federico; Chiappella, Annalisa; Casadei, Beatrice; Bramanti, Stefania; Ljevar, Silva; Chiusolo, Patrizia; Di Rocco, Alice; Tisi, Maria C.; Car...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
bcd-24-0052.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 6.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
7429371.zip

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 774.9 kB
Formato Zip File
774.9 kB Zip File Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1007022
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact